Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@misc{1396129, author = {Rozehnalová, Naděžda and Zavadilová, Lucie and Mahdalová, Silvie}, keywords = {choice of court agreement - optional choice of court agreement - exclusive choice of court agreement}, language = {eng}, title = {Czech national report on Optional Choice of Court Agreements - Fukuoka Congress 2018}, year = {2017} }
TY - GEN ID - 1396129 AU - Rozehnalová, Naděžda - Zavadilová, Lucie - Mahdalová, Silvie PY - 2017 TI - Czech national report on Optional Choice of Court Agreements - Fukuoka Congress 2018 KW - choice of court agreement - optional choice of court agreement - exclusive choice of court agreement N2 - Agreements on jurisdiction are and have been regulated in the Czech Republic by a number of legal norms of domestic, European and international origin. Despite the existence of a favourable legal environment (and professional legal literature recommendations), parties’ agreements on jurisdiction do not constitute the preferred manner of establishing court jurisdiction, either at the national or international level. This is due to several reasons, some of which are historically conditioned and the outcome of a certain force of habit. With respect to the national level, it is important to note that until 1991 all disputes between companies were processed within the framework of a special economic arbitration, i.e. not before the courts. ER -
ROZEHNALOVÁ, Naděžda, Lucie ZAVADILOVÁ a Silvie MAHDALOVÁ. \textit{Czech national report on Optional Choice of Court Agreements - Fukuoka Congress 2018}. 2017.
|