How (not) to Conduct Team Content Analysis: Experience From
Systematic Literature Review

D 2017

How (not) to Conduct Team Content Analysis: Experience From Systematic Literature Review

KRČÁL, Michal

Základní údaje

Originální název

How (not) to Conduct Team Content Analysis: Experience From Systematic Literature Review

Autoři

KRČÁL, Michal (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

Reading, UK, Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management, od s. 194-202, 9 s. 2017

Nakladatel

Academic Conferences and Publishing International

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Stať ve sborníku

Obor

50204 Business and management

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

elektronická verze "online"

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14560/17:00095189

Organizační jednotka

Ekonomicko-správní fakulta

ISBN

978-1-911218-41-8

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-85054023021

Klíčová slova anglicky

content analysis; systematic literature review; team research; qualitative data analysis; guidelines

Změněno: 16. 4. 2019 13:51, Ing. Mgr. Michal Krčál, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Growing attention of academicians across disciplines for a systematic literature review (SLR) creates demand for more knowledge in this area. Although the volume of methodological articles and books focusing on the SLR is growing, certain aspects of this methodological approach seem to be neglected. Firstly, literature focused on the SLR concentrates mainly on conducting the review by one person and is not giving details or guidelines on how to cooperate in teams. Secondly, despite a decent number of the SLR articles in scientific journals, information about the analytical and synthesis part of the SLR lacks details. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to describe in detail the procedures and the tools used during one SLR conducted by a team of five researchers. Moreover, as the team content analysis was used for the analytical part of the literature review detail description of the activities and the used tools during the content analysis is presented. This article is framed as a descriptive single case study that is based on project documents, communication, meetings minutes and observations conducted by me in the role of the SLR team leader. The described SLR is the first phase of a three-year research project that focuses on the ways of using feedback from customers as knowledge for new product or service development and innovations. Besides the detailed description of the whole process, this article also discusses some factors that were influencing the quality, effectiveness and efficiency of the team management. The following factors were identified as crucial for the team management: software tools, knowledge of software tools, experience with the content analysis, activities of team members in other research projects and teaching, and nature of externally funded grant project.

Návaznosti

GA16-16260S, projekt VaV

Název: Přístup managementu k redukci zpětných toků ve vazbě na spokojenost zákazníků a neustálé zlepšování

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Přístup managementu k redukci zpětných toků ve vazbě na spokojenost zákazníků a neustálé zlepšování

Citovat

KRČÁL, Michal. How (not) to Conduct Team Content Analysis: Experience From Systematic Literature Review. Online. In Anthony P. Buckley, Katrina Lawlor. Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management. Reading, UK: Academic Conferences and Publishing International, 2017, s. 194-202. ISBN 978-1-911218-41-8.

@inproceedings{1396137,
   author = {Krčál, Michal},
   address = {Reading, UK},
   booktitle = {Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management},
   editor = {Anthony P. Buckley, Katrina Lawlor},
   keywords = {content analysis; systematic literature review; team research; qualitative data analysis; guidelines},
   howpublished = {elektronická verze "online"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Reading, UK},
   isbn = {978-1-911218-41-8},
   pages = {194-202},
   publisher = {Academic Conferences and Publishing International},
   title = {How (not) to Conduct Team Content Analysis: Experience From Systematic Literature Review},
   year = {2017}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 1396137
AU  - Krčál, Michal
PY  - 2017
TI  - How (not) to Conduct Team Content Analysis: Experience From Systematic Literature Review
PB  - Academic Conferences and Publishing International
CY  - Reading, UK
SN  - 9781911218418
KW  - content analysis
KW  - systematic literature review
KW  - team research
KW  - qualitative data analysis
KW  - guidelines
N2  - Growing attention of academicians across disciplines for a systematic literature review (SLR) creates demand for more knowledge in this area. Although the volume of methodological articles and books focusing on the SLR is growing, certain aspects of this methodological approach seem to be neglected. Firstly, literature focused on the SLR concentrates mainly on conducting the review by one person and is not giving details or guidelines on how to cooperate in teams. Secondly, despite a decent number of the SLR articles in scientific journals, information about the analytical and synthesis part of the SLR lacks details. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to describe in detail the procedures and the tools used during one SLR conducted by a team of five researchers. Moreover, as the team content analysis was used for the analytical part of the literature review detail description of the activities and the used tools during the content analysis is presented. This article is framed as a descriptive single case study that is based on project documents, communication, meetings minutes and observations conducted by me in the role of the SLR team leader. The described SLR is the first phase of a three-year research project that focuses on the ways of using feedback from customers as knowledge for new product or service development and innovations. Besides the detailed description of the whole process, this article also discusses some factors that were influencing the quality, effectiveness and efficiency of the team management. The following factors were identified as crucial for the team management: software tools, knowledge of software tools, experience with the content analysis, activities of team members in other research projects and teaching, and nature of externally funded grant project.
ER  -

KRČÁL, Michal. How (not) to Conduct Team Content Analysis: Experience From Systematic Literature Review. Online. In Anthony P. Buckley, Katrina Lawlor. \textit{Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management}. Reading, UK: Academic Conferences and Publishing International, 2017, s.~194-202. ISBN~978-1-911218-41-8.

Přehled o publikaci