Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@proceedings{1396959, author = {Raclavský, Jiří}, booktitle = {Cognition and Language 2017}, keywords = {inference; derivation; proof; reductio ad absurdum; paradox}, language = {eng}, note = {(konf. abstrakt)}, title = {D-Conception of Inference (with an Examination ofParadoxical Reasoning)}, url = {http://ibrak.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/CaL2017_BoA.pdf}, year = {2017} }
TY - CONF ID - 1396959 AU - Raclavský, Jiří PY - 2017 TI - D-Conception of Inference (with an Examination ofParadoxical Reasoning) N1 - (konf. abstrakt) KW - inference KW - derivation KW - proof KW - reductio ad absurdum KW - paradox UR - http://ibrak.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/CaL2017_BoA.pdf N2 - The talk presents an elaboration and several applications of Frege's and Tichý's two-dimensional (2D) conception of inference. In contrast to ordinary (1D) conception, each inferential step is a whole deduction and thus logical truth - not a single formula that need not to be logically valid (being mere hypothesis, assumption). 2D-conception is thus more satisfactory from an epistemological point of view. As shown by Tichý and Pezlar, reductio ad absurdum proofs cannot have a satisfactory explanation on 1D-conception. I show its 2D-explanation; similarly for indirect proofs. Moreover, a solution to the Paradox of Inference is offered. ER -
RACLAVSKÝ, Jiří. D-Conception of Inference (with an Examination ofParadoxical Reasoning). In \textit{Cognition and Language 2017}. 2017.
|