2017
Impact of prior therapy on the efficacy and safety of oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs. placebo-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in TOURMALINE-MM1
MATEOS, M.V.; T. MASSZI; N. GRZASKO; M. HANSSON; I. SANDHU et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Impact of prior therapy on the efficacy and safety of oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs. placebo-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in TOURMALINE-MM1
Autoři
MATEOS, M.V.; T. MASSZI; N. GRZASKO; M. HANSSON; I. SANDHU; Luděk POUR; L. VITERBO; S.R. JACKSON; A.M. STOPPA; P. GIMSING; M. HAMADANI; G. BORSARU; D. BERG; J.C. LIN; A. DI BACCO; H. VAN DE VELDE; P.G. RICHARDSON a P. MOREAU
Vydání
haematologica, PAVIA, FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION, 2017, 0390-6078
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30200 3.2 Clinical medicine
Stát vydavatele
Itálie
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 9.090
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000411964200029
Klíčová slova anglicky
ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone; placebo-lenalidomide-dexamethasone
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 12. 4. 2018 18:45, Soňa Böhmová
Anotace
V originále
Prior treatment exposure in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma may affect outcomes with subsequent therapies. We analyzed efficacy and safety according to prior treatment in the phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib-Rd) versus placebo-Rd. Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma received ixazomib-Rd or placebo-Rd. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in subgroups defined according to type (proteasome inhibitor [ PI] and immunomodulatory drug) and number (1 vs. 2 or 3) of prior therapies received. Of 722 patients, 503 (70%) had received a prior PI, and 397 (55%) prior lenalidomide/thalidomide; 425 patients had received 1 prior therapy, and 297 received 2 or 3 prior therapies. At a median follow up of similar to 15 months, PFS was prolonged with ixazomib-Rd vs. placebo-Rd regardless of type of prior therapy received; HR 0.739 and 0.749 in PI-exposed and -naive patients, HR 0.744 and 0.700 in immunomodulatory-drug-exposed and -naive patients, respectively. PFS benefit with ixazomib-Rd vs. placebo-Rd appeared greater in patients with 2 or 3 prior therapies (HR 0.58) and in those with 1 prior therapy without prior transplant (HR 0.60) versus those with 1 prior therapy and transplant (HR 1.23). Across all subgroups, toxicity was consistent with that seen in the intent-to-treat population. In patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, ixazomib-Rd was associated with a consistent clinical benefit vs. placebo-Rd regardless of prior treatment with bortezomib or immunomodulatory drugs. Patients with 2 or 3 prior therapies, or 1 prior therapy without transplant seemed to have greater benefit than patients with 1 prior therapy and transplant.