2017
Classroom interaction in student presentations and follow-up discussions in a university EFL course
TŮMA, FrantišekZákladní údaje
Originální název
Classroom interaction in student presentations and follow-up discussions in a university EFL course
Autoři
Vydání
EARLI 2017: Education in the crossroads of economy and politics – Role of research in the advancement of public good (Tampere, 29. 8. - 2.9. 2017), 2017
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Prezentace na konferencích
Obor
50300 5.3 Education
Stát vydavatele
Finsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ne
Organizační jednotka
Pedagogická fakulta
Klíčová slova česky
interakce ve třídě, konverzační analýza, studentské referáty
Klíčová slova anglicky
classroom interaction, conversation analysis, student presentations
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 21. 1. 2018 16:43, doc. Mgr. František Tůma, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
This paper presents selected outcomes of a qualitative analysis of classroom interaction during student presentations and follow-up discussions in an English as a foreign language (EFL) course conducted in a Bachelor’s programme at a Czech university. Student presentations and subsequent discussions appear interesting both interactionally (e.g. collaborative aspects of “improvisation” during the presentation, the shift of control from the presenters towards the teacher after the presentation) and educationally, as these represent a student-centered activity, whose dynamics and organization remain relatively underresearched. The data (video-recordings of 11 90-minute lessons, 987 minutes) were collected as a case study of an intermediate EFL course for future teachers within a research project (GA ČR 15-08857S). To study the interactional dynamics, I used conversation analysis to analyze 12 presentations given by individuals or pairs. In this paper I will present the outcomes in the areas of the organization of repair during the presentations and the organization of turn-taking during the discussions. In presentations given by pairs, the presenters dealt with troubles (typically attempting to pronounce unknown words, problems with transitions) interactively using self-initiated peer-repair sequences, while individual students generally had to rely on self-repair. During the discussion phase, the participants always transitioned from turn-type pre-allocation (the students finished their presentation and typically asked for questions) to mediated turn-allocation (the teacher became a moderator and, finally, self-selected to ask several questions). At the end, I will compare the findings with relevant literature and evaluate the organization of presentations and discussions pedagogically.
Návaznosti
| GA15-08857S, projekt VaV |
|