2018
Adjusted comparison of daratumumab monotherapy versus real-world historical control data from the Czech Republic in heavily pretreated and highly refractory multiple myeloma patients
JELINEK, T.; V. MAISNAR; Luděk POUR; I. SPICKA; J. MINARIK et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Adjusted comparison of daratumumab monotherapy versus real-world historical control data from the Czech Republic in heavily pretreated and highly refractory multiple myeloma patients
Autoři
JELINEK, T.; V. MAISNAR; Luděk POUR; I. SPICKA; J. MINARIK; E. GREGORA; P. KESSLER; M. SYKORA; H. FRANKOVA; D. ADAMOVA; M. WROBEL; P. MIKULA; Jiří JARKOVSKÝ ORCID; J. DIELS; X. GATOPOULOU; S. VESELA; H. BESSON; Lucie BROŽOVÁ; T. ITO a R. HAJEK
Vydání
Current medical research and opinion, Oxon, Taylor & Francis, 2018, 0300-7995
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30218 General and internal medicine
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.345
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/18:00103214
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000430209400003
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85042106038
Klíčová slova anglicky
Czech Republic; multiple myeloma; daratumumab; matching adjusted indirect comparison; treatment outcomes
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 26. 3. 2019 10:25, Soňa Böhmová
Anotace
V originále
Objectives: We conducted an adjusted comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for daratumumab monotherapy versus standard of care, as observed in a real-world historical cohort of heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients from Czech Republic. Methods: Using longitudinal chart data from the Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG) of the Czech Myeloma Group, patient-level data from the RMG was pooled with pivotal daratumumab monotherapy studies (GEN501 and SIRIUS; 16mg/kg). Results: From the RMG database, we identified 972 treatment lines in 463 patients previously treated with both a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug. Treatment initiation dates for RMG patients were between March 2006 and March 2015. The most frequently used treatment regimens were lenalidomide-based regimens (33.4%), chemotherapy (18.1%), bortezomib-based regimens (13.6%), thalidomide-based regimens (8.0%), and bortezomib plus thalidomide (5.3%). Few patients were treated with carfilzomib-based regimens (2.5%) and pomalidomide-based regimens (2.4%). Median observed PFS for daratumumab and the RMG cohort was 4.0 and 5.8 months (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.39), respectively, and unadjusted median OS was 20.1 and 11.9 months (unadjusted HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.48-0.78), respectively. Statistical adjustments for differences in baseline characteristics were made using patient-level data. The adjusted HRs (95% CI) for PFS and OS for daratumumab versus the RMG cohort were 0.79 (0.56-1.12; p=.192) and 0.33 (0.21-0.52; p<.001), respectively. Conclusions: Adjusted comparisons between trial data and historical cohorts can provide useful insights to clinicians and reimbursement decision makers on relative treatment efficacies in the absence of head-to-head comparison studies for daratumumab monotherapy.