Resident's preferences for urban brownfield revitalization:
Insights from two Czech cities

J 2018

Resident's preferences for urban brownfield revitalization: Insights from two Czech cities

NAVRÁTIL, Josef; Kamil PÍCHA; Stanislav MARTINÁT; Paul C. NATHANAIL; Kamila TUREČKOVÁ et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Resident's preferences for urban brownfield revitalization: Insights from two Czech cities

Autoři

NAVRÁTIL, Josef; Kamil PÍCHA; Stanislav MARTINÁT; Paul C. NATHANAIL; Kamila TUREČKOVÁ a Andrea HOLEŠINSKÁ

Vydání

Land Use Policy, Elsevier Limited, 2018, 0264-8377

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50704 Environmental sciences

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 3.573

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14560/18:00103437

Organizační jednotka

Ekonomicko-správní fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Brownfields; Revitalization; Recreation grounds; Demolition; Refurbishment; Development

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 23. 11. 2023 10:18, Mgr. Pavlína Kurková

Anotace

V originále

Residents preferences are one of the factors in deciding how brownfields should be revitalized. We compare the views of residents in a city with many brownfields (Karviná) with those in a city with only few brownfields (České Budějovice). We assessed the preferences of residents for four global regeneration alternatives (refurbishment, demolition, open space, (re)development) in three different areas of a city (city centre, inner city, city outskirts). A one percent population sample of two post-socialistic cities in the Czech Republic, was used for the comparison. Positive preferences towards brownfield regeneration were confirmed. We found spatial differences in preferences between refurbishment and demolition of brownfields in each city area: demolition was preferred for inner city brownfields whereas refurbishment was preferred in the city centre and outskirts. Differences were also identified between the two cities: residents of the brownfield rich city preferred demolition, whereas residents of the city with few brownfields preferred refurbishment. Creating new public open space, for residents recreation, was given a lower importance within the city centre and a higher significance in outskirts. With the support of a combined ANOVA model, significant differences in residents preferences were found for distinct types of regeneration with regards to the cities character, the location of brownfields within the city and residents proximity.

Citovat

NAVRÁTIL, Josef; Kamil PÍCHA; Stanislav MARTINÁT; Paul C. NATHANAIL; Kamila TUREČKOVÁ a Andrea HOLEŠINSKÁ. Resident's preferences for urban brownfield revitalization: Insights from two Czech cities. Land Use Policy. Elsevier Limited, 2018, roč. 76, July, s. 224-234. ISSN 0264-8377. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.013.

@article{1428106,
   author = {Navrátil, Josef and Pícha, Kamil and Martinát, Stanislav and Nathanail, Paul C. and Turečková, Kamila and Holešinská, Andrea},
   article_number = {July},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.013},
   keywords = {Brownfields; Revitalization; Recreation grounds; Demolition; Refurbishment; Development},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0264-8377},
   journal = {Land Use Policy},
   title = {Resident's preferences for urban brownfield revitalization: Insights from two Czech cities},
   url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837717314680?via%3Dihub},
   volume = {76},
   year = {2018}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1428106
AU  - Navrátil, Josef - Pícha, Kamil - Martinát, Stanislav - Nathanail, Paul C. - Turečková, Kamila - Holešinská, Andrea
PY  - 2018
TI  - Resident's preferences for urban brownfield revitalization: Insights from two Czech cities
JF  - Land Use Policy
VL  - 76
IS  - July
SP  - 224-234
EP  - 224-234
PB  - Elsevier Limited
SN  - 02648377
KW  - Brownfields
KW  - Revitalization
KW  - Recreation grounds
KW  - Demolition
KW  - Refurbishment
KW  - Development
UR  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837717314680?via%3Dihub
L2  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837717314680?via%3Dihub
N2  - Residents preferences are one of the factors in deciding how brownfields should be revitalized. We compare the views of residents in a city with many brownfields (Karviná) with those in a city with only few brownfields (České Budějovice). We assessed the preferences of residents for four global regeneration alternatives (refurbishment, demolition, open space, (re)development) in three different areas of a city (city centre, inner city, city outskirts). A one percent population sample of two post-socialistic cities in the Czech Republic, was used for the comparison. Positive preferences towards brownfield regeneration were confirmed. We found spatial differences in preferences between refurbishment and demolition of brownfields in each city area: demolition was preferred for inner city brownfields whereas refurbishment was preferred in the city centre and outskirts. Differences were also identified between the two cities: residents of the brownfield rich city preferred demolition, whereas residents of the city with few brownfields preferred refurbishment. Creating new public open space, for residents recreation, was given a lower importance within the city centre and a higher significance in outskirts. With the support of a combined ANOVA model, significant differences in residents preferences were found for distinct types of regeneration with regards to the cities character, the location of brownfields within the city and residents proximity.
ER  -

NAVRÁTIL, Josef; Kamil PÍCHA; Stanislav MARTINÁT; Paul C. NATHANAIL; Kamila TUREČKOVÁ a Andrea HOLEŠINSKÁ. Resident's preferences for urban brownfield revitalization: Insights from two Czech cities. \textit{Land Use Policy}. Elsevier Limited, 2018, roč.~76, July, s.~224-234. ISSN~0264-8377. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.013.

Přehled o publikaci