Analytic atheism : A cross-culturally weak and fickle
phenomenon?

J 2018

Analytic atheism : A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?

GERVAIS, Will M; Michiel VAN ELK; Dimitrios XYGALATAS; Ryan Thomas MCKAY; Mark AVEYARD et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Analytic atheism : A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?

Autoři

Vydání

Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, 2018, 1930-2975

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

60304 Religious studies

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.253

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/18:00103780

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

UT WoS

000433954200004

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-85048345430

Klíčová slova anglicky

atheism; cultural learning; dual process cognition; religious cognition; replicability; WEIRD people; culture

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 4. 3. 2019 10:46, Mgr. Monika Kellnerová

Anotace

V originále

Religious belief is a topic of longstanding interest to psychological science, but the psychology of religious disbelief is a relative newcomer. One prominently discussed model is analytic atheism, wherein cognitive reflection, as measured with the Cognitive Reflection Test, overrides religious intuitions and instruction. Consistent with this model, performance-based measures of cognitive reflection predict religious disbelief in WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) samples. However, the generality of analytic atheism remains unknown. Drawing on a large global sample (N = 3461) from 13 religiously, demographically, and culturally diverse societies, we find that analytic atheism as usually assessed is in fact quite fickle cross-culturally, appearing robustly only in aggregate analyses and in three individual countries. The results provide additional evidence for culture’s effects on core beliefs.

Návaznosti

EE2.3.20.0048, projekt VaV

Název: Laboratoř pro experimentální výzkum náboženství

Citovat

GERVAIS, Will M; Michiel VAN ELK; Dimitrios XYGALATAS; Ryan Thomas MCKAY; Mark AVEYARD; Emma E BUCHTEL; Ilan DAR-NIMROD; Eva KUNDTOVÁ KLOCOVÁ; Jonathan E RAMSAY; Tapani RIEKKI; Annika M SVEDHOLM-HÄKKINEN a Joseph BULBULIA. Analytic atheism : A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon? Judgment and Decision Making. Society for Judgment and Decision Making, 2018, roč. 13, č. 3, s. 268-274. ISSN 1930-2975.

@article{1440877,
   author = {Gervais, Will M and van Elk, Michiel and Xygalatas, Dimitrios and McKay, Ryan Thomas and Aveyard, Mark and Buchtel, Emma E and DarandNimrod, Ilan and Kundtová Klocová, Eva and Ramsay, Jonathan E and Riekki, Tapani and SvedholmandHäkkinen, Annika M and Bulbulia, Joseph},
   article_number = {3},
   keywords = {atheism; cultural learning; dual process cognition; religious cognition; replicability; WEIRD people; culture},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1930-2975},
   journal = {Judgment and Decision Making},
   title = {Analytic atheism : A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?},
   url = {http://journal.sjdm.org/18/18228/jdm18228.pdf},
   volume = {13},
   year = {2018}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1440877
AU  - Gervais, Will M - van Elk, Michiel - Xygalatas, Dimitrios - McKay, Ryan Thomas - Aveyard, Mark - Buchtel, Emma E - Dar-Nimrod, Ilan - Kundtová Klocová, Eva - Ramsay, Jonathan E - Riekki, Tapani - Svedholm-Häkkinen, Annika M - Bulbulia, Joseph
PY  - 2018
TI  - Analytic atheism : A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?
JF  - Judgment and Decision Making
VL  - 13
IS  - 3
SP  - 268-274
EP  - 268-274
PB  - Society for Judgment and Decision Making
SN  - 19302975
KW  - atheism
KW  - cultural learning
KW  - dual process cognition
KW  - religious cognition
KW  - replicability
KW  - WEIRD people
KW  - culture
UR  - http://journal.sjdm.org/18/18228/jdm18228.pdf
L2  - http://journal.sjdm.org/18/18228/jdm18228.pdf
N2  - Religious belief is a topic of longstanding interest to psychological science, but the psychology of religious disbelief is a relative newcomer. One prominently discussed model is analytic atheism, wherein cognitive reflection, as measured with the Cognitive Reflection Test, overrides religious intuitions and instruction. Consistent with this model, performance-based measures of cognitive reflection predict religious disbelief in WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) samples. However, the generality of analytic atheism remains unknown. Drawing on a large global sample (N = 3461) from 13 religiously, demographically, and culturally diverse societies, we find that analytic atheism as usually assessed is in fact quite fickle cross-culturally, appearing robustly only in aggregate analyses and in three individual countries. The results provide additional evidence for culture’s effects on core beliefs.
ER  -

GERVAIS, Will M; Michiel VAN ELK; Dimitrios XYGALATAS; Ryan Thomas MCKAY; Mark AVEYARD; Emma E BUCHTEL; Ilan DAR-NIMROD; Eva KUNDTOVÁ KLOCOVÁ; Jonathan E RAMSAY; Tapani RIEKKI; Annika M SVEDHOLM-HÄKKINEN a Joseph BULBULIA. Analytic atheism : A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon? \textit{Judgment and Decision Making}. Society for Judgment and Decision Making, 2018, roč.~13, č.~3, s.~268-274. ISSN~1930-2975.

Přehled o publikaci