2018
The level of aggressiveness among Slovak boxers
VÍT, MichalZákladní údaje
Originální název
The level of aggressiveness among Slovak boxers
Autoři
Vydání
7th IMACSSS International Conference, 4th World Scientific Congress of Combat Sports and Martial Arts, 2018
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Konferenční abstrakt
Obor
30306 Sport and fitness sciences
Stát vydavatele
Polsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sportovních studií
ISBN
978-83-7996-585-4
Klíčová slova česky
úpolové sporty; hněv; hostilita; fyzická agrese; verbální agrese
Klíčová slova anglicky
combat sports; anger; hostility; physical aggression; verbal aggression
Změněno: 6. 11. 2018 11:01, PhDr. Michal Vít, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
Backround Combat sports should be practised with regards to a positive development of personality in diverse areas, such as somatic [Struhar, Dovrtelova and Reguli 2015], moral [Cynarski et al. 2015] and psychological [Reguli et al. 2014]. Boxing is often considered as a typical example of an aggressive sport representing violence [Wann and Branscombe 1990; Cynarski and Litwiniuk 2006). Problem and aim Some authors claim that combative sports training could lead to a reduction of aggressiveness among the trainees [Ziaee et al. 2012; Kuśnierz, Cynarski and Litwiniuk 2014; Pačesová and Putala 2017]. We were focused od aggressivenes level among Slovak boxers. Methods Self-report research tool Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) [Buss and Perry 1992] was involved in discovering aggressivenes level in the research sample. The total aggressivenes is divided into four factors (anger, hostility, physical aggression, verbal aggression). The research sample involves N=105 male Slovak boxers in the age 24.14 ± 5.42, with the length of boxing training 3.89 ± 5.93 years. Basis statistics methods were used for the analysis. Results Our research showed the slightly lower level in total aggressivenes (77.2) comparing to BPAQ values (77.8). Also, other two factors (physical aggression 23.11 ± 7.10; verbal aggression 14.10 ± 3.79) scored on the lower level than BPAQ standard (physical aggression 24.3 ± 7.7; verbal aggression 15.2 ± 3.84). On the other hand, the slightly higher level was observed in two other factors: anger (17.53 ± 5.96) and hostility (22.44 ± 5.88), comparing with BPAQ values (anger 17.0 ± 5.6; hostility 21.3 ± 5.5). Conclusions In our research, we did not find any differences on the level of statistical significance p<0.05 in aggressiveness level of Slovak boxers comparing with BPAQ values, which are based on the sample N=612 males from a non-sport population.