J 2018

A bacterium-based contact assay for evaluating the quality of solid samples Results from an international ring-test

MARQUES, Catarina R.; Najoi EL-AZHARI; Fabrice MARTIN-LAURENT; Pascal PANDARD; Camille MELINE et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

A bacterium-based contact assay for evaluating the quality of solid samples Results from an international ring-test

Autoři

MARQUES, Catarina R.; Najoi EL-AZHARI; Fabrice MARTIN-LAURENT; Pascal PANDARD; Camille MELINE; Alice L. PETRE; Suzanne ECKERT; Juergen ZIPPERLE; Martin VANA; Stanislav MALY; Lucie ŠINDELÁŘOVÁ; Anna SLAVÍKOVÁ AMEMORI; Jakub HOFMAN; Anu KUMAR; Hai DOAN; Mike MCLAUGHLIN; Elizabeth RICHTER a Joerg ROMBKE

Vydání

Journal of Hazardous Materials, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science BV. 2018, 0304-3894

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10511 Environmental sciences

Stát vydavatele

Nizozemské království

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 7.650

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/18:00105751

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

EID Scopus

Klíčová slova anglicky

Arthrobacter globiformis; Dehydrogenase activity; Soils; Wastes; ISO 18187

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 29. 8. 2019 07:49, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

The contact assay measuring the inhibition of Arthrobacter globiformis dehydrogenase activity as an endpoint to evaluate the toxicity of solid samples was tested in an international ring-test to validate its performance for ISO standardization (ISO/CD 18187). This work reports the results of the ring-test involving 9 laboratories from six countries. At least 8 valid data sets were obtained for each sample and more than three quarters of the participants attained the validity criteria defined in the standard. The coefficient of variation within (CVr) and between (CVR) laboratories was generally on average < 15% and < 30% for negative and positive controls, respectively. Regarding solid samples, the laboratories provided a similar ranking of the samples based on their toxicity, despite some variation in the LOEC values. The logarithmic within-lab standard deviation < 0.50 for soils and < 0.25 for wastes evidenced a good repeatability. The between-lab variability assessed by a CVR < 30%, minimum-maximum factor < 4 and a reproducibility standard deviation (SDR) < 0.13 for a greatpart of the solid samples, confirmed the test reproducibility. Overall, this assay proved to be robust, sensitive and feasible for routine use towards the quality assessment of soils and wastes.