Money Laundering in International Commercial Arbitration

k 2018

Money Laundering in International Commercial Arbitration

DRLIČKOVÁ, Klára

Základní údaje

Originální název

Money Laundering in International Commercial Arbitration

Autoři

DRLIČKOVÁ, Klára

Vydání

31st International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development - “Legal Challenges of Modern World” 2018

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

international commercial arbitration; money laundering; obligations of arbitrators; responsibility of arbitrators

Změněno: 27. 1. 2019 12:55, doc. JUDr. Klára Drličková, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

The aim of this paper is to analyse arbitrator’s duties to report and to testify under criminal law and the impact of arbitrator’s duty to maintain confidentiality on such duties. It is generally accepted that an arbitrator is bound by the duty to maintain confidentiality. The duty of arbitrators to maintain confidentiality is wide in scope, however, not absolute. One of its limits may result from criminal laws. In the Czech Republic, the arbitrator’s duty to maintain confidentiality is provided for by the Section 6(1) of the Czech Arbitration Act. An arbitrator may have the reporting duty under the Section 368 of the Czech Criminal Code if he/she gains credible knowledge about accepting bribes and bribery during arbitration even though he/she is bound by the duty to maintain confidentiality. Otherwise he/she risks his/her own criminal liability under Section 368. Under Section 99 the Czech Code of Criminal Procedure the questioning of an arbitrator is prohibited as regards the information covered by his/her duty to maintain confidentiality resulting from Section 6 of Czech Arbitration Act. This is not applicable in the case of accepting bribes and bribery in the scope to which the arbitrator has the reporting duty. In such a case the arbitrator has to testify. Section 99 refers only to the duty of confidentiality imposed by the Czech Republic.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/1124/2017, interní kód MU

Název: Riešenie sporov dotknutých korupciou v medzinárodnej obchodnej arbitráži

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Riešenie sporov dotknutých korupciou v medzinárodnej obchodnej arbitráži, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Citovat

DRLIČKOVÁ, Klára. Money Laundering in International Commercial Arbitration. In 31st International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development - “Legal Challenges of Modern World”. 2018.

@proceedings{1490957,
   author = {Drličková, Klára},
   booktitle = {31st International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development - “Legal Challenges of Modern World”},
   keywords = {international commercial arbitration; money laundering; obligations of arbitrators; responsibility of arbitrators},
   language = {eng},
   title = {Money Laundering in International Commercial Arbitration},
   year = {2018}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 1490957
AU  - Drličková, Klára
PY  - 2018
TI  - Money Laundering in International Commercial Arbitration
KW  - international commercial arbitration
KW  - money laundering
KW  - obligations of arbitrators
KW  - responsibility of arbitrators
N2  - The aim of this paper is to analyse arbitrator’s duties to report and to testify under criminal law and the impact of arbitrator’s duty to maintain confidentiality on such duties. It is generally accepted that an arbitrator is bound by the duty to maintain confidentiality. The duty of arbitrators to maintain confidentiality is wide in scope, however, not absolute. One of its limits may result from criminal laws. In the Czech Republic, the arbitrator’s duty to maintain confidentiality is provided for by the Section 6(1) of the Czech Arbitration Act. An arbitrator may have the reporting duty under the Section 368 of the Czech Criminal Code if he/she gains credible knowledge about accepting bribes and bribery during arbitration even though he/she is bound by the duty to maintain confidentiality. Otherwise he/she risks his/her own criminal liability under Section 368. Under Section 99 the Czech Code of Criminal Procedure the questioning of an arbitrator is prohibited as regards the information covered by his/her duty to maintain confidentiality resulting from Section 6 of Czech Arbitration Act. This is not applicable in the case of accepting bribes and bribery in the scope to which the arbitrator has the reporting duty. In such a case the arbitrator has to testify. Section 99 refers only to the duty of confidentiality imposed by the Czech Republic.
ER  -

DRLIČKOVÁ, Klára. Money Laundering in International Commercial Arbitration. In \textit{31st International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development - “Legal Challenges of Modern World”}. 2018.

Přehled o publikaci