2018
The biocompatibility of polyaniline and polypyrrole: A comparative study of their cytotoxicity, embryotoxicity and impurity profile
HUMPOLÍČEK, Petr; V. KASPARKOVA; Jiří PACHERNÍK; J. STEJSKAL; P. BOBER et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
The biocompatibility of polyaniline and polypyrrole: A comparative study of their cytotoxicity, embryotoxicity and impurity profile
Autoři
HUMPOLÍČEK, Petr; V. KASPARKOVA; Jiří PACHERNÍK; J. STEJSKAL; P. BOBER; Z. CAPAKOVA; Katarzyna Anna RADASZKIEWICZ; I. JUNKAR a Marián LEHOCKÝ
Vydání
MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, AMSTERDAM, ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, 2018, 0928-4931
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
10601 Cell biology
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 4.959
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14310/18:00106564
Organizační jednotka
Přírodovědecká fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Polyaniline; Polypyrrole; Biocompatibility
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 23. 4. 2024 14:26, Mgr. Michal Petr
Anotace
V originále
Conducting polymers (CP), namely polyaniline (PANI) and polypyrrole (PPy), are promising materials applicable for the use as biointerfaces as they intrinsically combine electronic and ionic conductivity. Although a number of works have employed PANI or PPy in the preparation of copolymers, composites, and blends with other polymers, there is no systematic study dealing with the comparison of their fundamental biological properties. The present study, therefore, compares the biocompatibility of PANI and PPy in terms of cytotoxicity (using NIH/3T3 fibroblasts and embryonic stem cells) and embryotoxicity (their impact on erythropoiesis and cardiomyogenesis within embryonic bodies). The novelty of the study lies not only in the fact that embryotoxicity is presented for the first time for both studied polymers, but also in the elimination of inter-laboratory variations within the testing, such variation making the comparison of previously published works difficult. The results clearly show that there is a bigger difference between the biocompatibility of the respective polymers in their salt and base forms than between PANI and PPy as such. PANI and PPy can, therefore, be similarly applied in biomedicine when solely their biological properties are considered. Impurity content detected by mass spectroscopy is presented. These results can change the generally accepted opinion of the scientific community on better biocompatibility of PPy in comparison with PANI.