J 2018

The biocompatibility of polyaniline and polypyrrole: A comparative study of their cytotoxicity, embryotoxicity and impurity profile

HUMPOLÍČEK, Petr; V. KASPARKOVA; Jiří PACHERNÍK; J. STEJSKAL; P. BOBER et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

The biocompatibility of polyaniline and polypyrrole: A comparative study of their cytotoxicity, embryotoxicity and impurity profile

Autoři

HUMPOLÍČEK, Petr; V. KASPARKOVA; Jiří PACHERNÍK; J. STEJSKAL; P. BOBER; Z. CAPAKOVA; Katarzyna Anna RADASZKIEWICZ; I. JUNKAR a Marián LEHOCKÝ

Vydání

MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, AMSTERDAM, ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, 2018, 0928-4931

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10601 Cell biology

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 4.959

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/18:00106564

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

EID Scopus

Klíčová slova anglicky

Polyaniline; Polypyrrole; Biocompatibility

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 23. 4. 2024 14:26, Mgr. Michal Petr

Anotace

V originále

Conducting polymers (CP), namely polyaniline (PANI) and polypyrrole (PPy), are promising materials applicable for the use as biointerfaces as they intrinsically combine electronic and ionic conductivity. Although a number of works have employed PANI or PPy in the preparation of copolymers, composites, and blends with other polymers, there is no systematic study dealing with the comparison of their fundamental biological properties. The present study, therefore, compares the biocompatibility of PANI and PPy in terms of cytotoxicity (using NIH/3T3 fibroblasts and embryonic stem cells) and embryotoxicity (their impact on erythropoiesis and cardiomyogenesis within embryonic bodies). The novelty of the study lies not only in the fact that embryotoxicity is presented for the first time for both studied polymers, but also in the elimination of inter-laboratory variations within the testing, such variation making the comparison of previously published works difficult. The results clearly show that there is a bigger difference between the biocompatibility of the respective polymers in their salt and base forms than between PANI and PPy as such. PANI and PPy can, therefore, be similarly applied in biomedicine when solely their biological properties are considered. Impurity content detected by mass spectroscopy is presented. These results can change the generally accepted opinion of the scientific community on better biocompatibility of PPy in comparison with PANI.