2019
Sequential therapy with bevacizumab and EGFR inhibitors for metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a national registry-based analysis
BUCHLER, Tomas; Renata CHLOUPKOVÁ; Alexandr POPRACH; Ondrej FIALA; Igor KISS et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Sequential therapy with bevacizumab and EGFR inhibitors for metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a national registry-based analysis
Autoři
BUCHLER, Tomas; Renata CHLOUPKOVÁ; Alexandr POPRACH; Ondrej FIALA; Igor KISS; Katerina KOPECKOVA; Ladislav DUŠEK; Veronika VESKRNOVA; Lubomir SLAVICEK; Milan KOHOUTEK; Jindrich FINEK; Marek SVOBODA; Lubos PETRUZELKA a Bohuslav MELICHAR
Vydání
CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, ALBANY, DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD, 2019, 1179-1322
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30204 Oncology
Stát vydavatele
Nový Zéland
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.886
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/19:00109476
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000454529000001
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85059478345
Klíčová slova anglicky
colorectal carcinoma; bevacizumab; panitumumab; cetuximab; sequence
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 11. 5. 2020 09:12, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Purpose: Although inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor and inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRi) are commonly used for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the optimal sequencing of the agents is currently unclear. Methods: A national registry of targeted therapies was used to analyze baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients with mCRC and wild-type KRAS exon 2 status who received bevacizumab and EGFRi (cetuximab or panitumumab) as a part of first- and second-line treatment in either sequence. Results: The cohort included 490 patients (181 patients treated with first-line EGFRi and second-line bevacizumab and 309 patients treated with first-line bevacizumab and second-line EGFRi). Median overall survival (OS) from the initiation on first-line therapy was similar for patients treated with either sequence, reaching 31.8 (95% CI 27.5-36.1) vs 31.4 months (95% CI 27.8-35.0) for EGFRi -> bevacizumab vs bevacizumab -> EGFRi cohort, respectively. Time from first-line initiation to progression on the second-line therapy [progression-free survival (PFS)] was 21.1 (95% CI 19.3-23.0) vs 19.3 months (95% CI 17.3-21.3) for bevacizumab -> EGFRi vs EGFRi -> bevacizumab cohort, respectively (P=0.016). Conclusion: This retrospective analysis of real-world data of patients with wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC showed no differences in OS between cohorts treated with bevacizumab -> EGFRi vs the reverse sequence while combined PFS favored the bevacizumab -> EGFRi sequence.