Voters' Perception of Pork-Barrel Politics: Evidence from
Survey Experiments in the Czech Republic and Slovakia

k 2019

Voters' Perception of Pork-Barrel Politics: Evidence from Survey Experiments in the Czech Republic and Slovakia

TÓTH, Michal; Miroslav NEMČOK a Peter SPÁČ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Voters' Perception of Pork-Barrel Politics: Evidence from Survey Experiments in the Czech Republic and Slovakia

Název anglicky

Voters' Perception of Pork-Barrel Politics: Evidence from Survey Experiments in the Czech Republic and Slovakia

Autoři

TÓTH, Michal ; Miroslav NEMČOK a Peter SPÁČ

Vydání

International Society of Political Psychology 2019 Annual Meeting, Lisbon, 2019

Další údaje

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Klíčová slova anglicky

Pork-Barrel, Survey Experiment, Public Opinion, Voting Behaviour, Representation

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam

Změněno: 17. 7. 2019 11:32, Mgr. Michal Tóth, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Effective and fair redistribution of public resources is seen as one of the key elements of a well-functioning democracy. In the real world, however, it turns out that resources are often allocated neither effectively nor equitably, and that the impartial allocation of public finances serves as a tool for securing votes and re-election. Despite compelling evidence for pork-barrel patterns in distributive politics, little is known about voters’ perception of this inherently unfair effort. Existing findings are not only limited but also contradictory – voters can perceive such strategy both positively and negatively – while data is gathered entirely in the Western countries with a long democratic tradition. We aim to contribute to these findings with patterns present in Central Europe, for which a higher degree of clientelism and corruption is characteristic. Thus, we conducted two survey experiments – in Slovakia and the Czech Republic – both of them using a representative sample of the population. Research design allowed us to manipulate with two main factors – (1) fairness of the distribution and (2) profit for the respondent – in order to study how they influence the support for a decision-maker responsible for the redistribution. While controlling for other relevant aspects (e.g., framing, policy saliency, and the administration level at which the finances are reallocated), we conclude that once voters realize their profit from the pork-barrel politics, they tend to be less critical towards unfairness embedded in the mechanism of redistribution.

Návaznosti

GA18-16928S, projekt VaV

Název: Distributivní politika ve střední Evropě

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Distributivní politika ve střední Evropě

Citovat

TÓTH, Michal; Miroslav NEMČOK a Peter SPÁČ. Voters' Perception of Pork-Barrel Politics: Evidence from Survey Experiments in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In International Society of Political Psychology 2019 Annual Meeting, Lisbon. 2019.

@proceedings{1546023,
   author = {Tóth, Michal and Nemčok, Miroslav and Spáč, Peter},
   booktitle = {International Society of Political Psychology 2019 Annual Meeting, Lisbon},
   keywords = {Pork-Barrel, Survey Experiment, Public Opinion, Voting Behaviour, Representation},
   title = {Voters' Perception of Pork-Barrel Politics: Evidence from Survey Experiments in the Czech Republic and Slovakia},
   url = {https://ispp.eventsair.com/QuickEventWebsitePortal/2019-ispp-annual-meeting/event-site/Agenda/AgendaItemDetail?id=4bd0c14d-8e28-409b-8f82-80791f19b5ee},
   year = {2019}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 1546023
AU  - Tóth, Michal - Nemčok, Miroslav - Spáč, Peter
PY  - 2019
TI  - Voters' Perception of Pork-Barrel Politics: Evidence from Survey Experiments in the Czech Republic and Slovakia
KW  - Pork-Barrel, Survey Experiment, Public Opinion, Voting Behaviour, Representation
UR  - https://ispp.eventsair.com/QuickEventWebsitePortal/2019-ispp-annual-meeting/event-site/Agenda/AgendaItemDetail?id=4bd0c14d-8e28-409b-8f82-80791f19b5ee
N2  - Effective and fair redistribution of public resources is seen as one of the key elements of a well-functioning democracy. In the real world, however, it turns out that resources are often allocated neither effectively nor equitably, and that the impartial allocation of public finances serves as a tool for securing votes and re-election. Despite compelling evidence for pork-barrel patterns in distributive politics, little is known about voters’ perception of this inherently unfair effort. Existing findings are not only limited but also contradictory – voters can perceive such strategy both positively and negatively – while data is gathered entirely in the Western countries with a long democratic tradition. We aim to contribute to these findings with patterns present in Central Europe, for which a higher degree of clientelism and corruption is characteristic. Thus, we conducted two survey experiments – in Slovakia and the Czech Republic – both of them using a representative sample of the population. Research design allowed us to manipulate with two main factors – (1) fairness of the distribution and (2) profit for the respondent – in order to study how they influence the support for a decision-maker responsible for the redistribution. While controlling for other relevant aspects (e.g., framing, policy saliency, and the administration level at which the finances are reallocated), we conclude that once voters realize their profit from the pork-barrel politics, they tend to be less critical towards unfairness embedded in the mechanism of redistribution.
ER  -

TÓTH, Michal; Miroslav NEMČOK a Peter SPÁČ. Voters' Perception of Pork-Barrel Politics: Evidence from Survey Experiments in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In \textit{International Society of Political Psychology 2019 Annual Meeting, Lisbon}. 2019.

Přehled o publikaci