2019
Documentary Director in Front of the Camera as a Way of Building Symbolic Capital Through Storytelling
VLČEK, MiroslavZákladní údaje
Originální název
Documentary Director in Front of the Camera as a Way of Building Symbolic Capital Through Storytelling
Autoři
Vydání
THE NECS 2019. Structures and Voices : Storytelling in Post-Digital Times, 13.–15. 06. 2019, Gdansk, 2019
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Prezentace na konferencích
Obor
60405 Studies on Film, Radio and Television
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14210/19:00110538
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
Klíčová slova česky
symbolický kapitál; dokumentární film; státní financování; reflexivita; herectví
Klíčová slova anglicky
symbolic capital; documentaries; state funding; reflexivity; acting
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam
Změněno: 19. 2. 2020 20:08, Mgr. Zuzana Matulíková
Anotace
V originále
Documentary director isn´t always seen on the screen, but it isn´t anything entirely rare as well. In my paper I will explain how different approaches to documentary storytelling work when the director decides to ´perform in front of the camera and how these different approaches influence public image of the director which could be crucial for building of his symbolic capital (as Bourdieu sees it) and later can influence decision-making process of film funds. With the use of discourse analysis, I identify four different styles Slovak directors used to be present in their movies. The study was made on all Slovak feature-length documentaries with the focus on movies of last decade when this approach to storytelling was much more present. Out of hundred feature-length documentaries I have chosen ten with the strongest presence of directors in the storytelling either in personal voice-over commenting on what we see in the movie, or in direct presence on the screen, where I identified three different positions: position of the director as an investigator of political affairs, position of the director telling his personal life-story and the director showing his skills in staging and influencing the reality he is interested in. Later, I confront those different positions, or roles as discourse analyst J. P. Gee would call them, with critical discourse on directors who use them and with evaluations of the projects submitted to Slovak Audiovisual Fund by these directors, in order to tell how choosing of these practices influence their public image and if it helps them to be more successful in application processes.
Návaznosti
| MUNI/A/0946/2018, interní kód MU |
|