From questions to relatives in Czech Sign Language

p 2019

From questions to relatives in Czech Sign Language

STRACHOŇOVÁ, Hana

Základní údaje

Originální název

From questions to relatives in Czech Sign Language

Autoři

STRACHOŇOVÁ, Hana

Vydání

Relatives interrogatives alternatives, 13-15 November 2019, Prague, 2019

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Vyžádané přednášky

Obor

60203 Linguistics

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/19:00111370

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Czech Sign Language; questions; relative clauses

Štítky

rivok

Změněno: 18. 2. 2020 08:53, Mgr. Igor Hlaváč

Anotace

V originále

There are analysis of relativization strategies in some sign languages (e.g. Liddel 1978 for American Sign Language, Pfau & Steinbach 2005 for German Sign Language, Branchini & Donati 2009, Cecchetto et al 2006 or Cecchetto & Donati 2016 for Italian Sign Language), or at least descriptions of relative structures (Sze 2003 for Sign Language of Hong Kong). As for Czech Sign Language (CSL), I am not aware of any work describing the situation. In this talk, I am interested in relative sentences in the context of the implicational hierarchy for the use of wh-words (1. content questions; 2. embedded questions; 3. correlatives; 4. light-headed relatives; 5. free relatives; headed relatives). Thus I will explore the use of wh-words in CSL, first in content questions with the intention to go as far as possible in the hierarchy. This first approach is more of a data description than analysis. Before constructing a theoretical model of relativization in CSL, it is essential to understand well the system of wh-words in this vastly understudied language (at least the definition/detection of wh-words and their syntactic position ). I built on the work that has been done on wh-words in CSL content questions (especially Pospíšilová 2012, Hronová 2002) and I systematize some data elicited from CSL online dictionary. At the end of the talk, I outline the way towards relativization in CSL using preliminary data obtained at my sessions with a native Deaf informant.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/0932/2018, interní kód MU

Název: Podpora výzkumu studentů na MU - obecná jazykovědy a baltistika 2019

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Podpora výzkumu studentů na MU - obecná jazykovědy a baltistika 2019, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Citovat

STRACHOŇOVÁ, Hana. From questions to relatives in Czech Sign Language. In Relatives interrogatives alternatives, 13-15 November 2019, Prague. 2019.

@misc{1580796,
   author = {Strachoňová, Hana},
   booktitle = {Relatives interrogatives alternatives, 13-15 November 2019, Prague},
   keywords = {Czech Sign Language; questions; relative clauses},
   language = {eng},
   title = {From questions to relatives in Czech Sign Language},
   url = {https://sites.google.com/view/rel-inter-alter/home?fbclid=IwAR1lqa-Q6KkyudtcveJnLuL4C5XWnydLDFEJo69rzEkey_2g6_hy8cVyEqA},
   year = {2019}
}

TY  - SLIDE
ID  - 1580796
AU  - Strachoňová, Hana
PY  - 2019
TI  - From questions to relatives in Czech Sign Language
KW  - Czech Sign Language
KW  - questions
KW  - relative clauses
UR  - https://sites.google.com/view/rel-inter-alter/home?fbclid=IwAR1lqa-Q6KkyudtcveJnLuL4C5XWnydLDFEJo69rzEkey_2g6_hy8cVyEqA
L2  - https://sites.google.com/view/rel-inter-alter/home?fbclid=IwAR1lqa-Q6KkyudtcveJnLuL4C5XWnydLDFEJo69rzEkey_2g6_hy8cVyEqA
N2  - There are analysis of relativization strategies in some sign languages (e.g. Liddel 1978 for American Sign Language, Pfau & Steinbach 2005 for German Sign Language, Branchini & Donati 2009, Cecchetto et al 2006 or Cecchetto & Donati 2016 for Italian Sign Language), or at least descriptions of relative structures (Sze 2003 for Sign Language of Hong Kong). As for Czech Sign Language (CSL), I am not aware of any work describing the situation. In this talk, I am interested in relative sentences in the context of the implicational hierarchy for the use of wh-words (1. content questions; 2. embedded questions; 3. correlatives; 4. light-headed relatives; 5. free relatives; headed relatives). Thus I will explore the use of wh-words in CSL, first in content questions with the intention to go as far as possible in the hierarchy. This first approach is more of a data description than analysis. Before constructing a theoretical model of relativization in CSL, it is essential to understand well the system of wh-words in this vastly understudied language (at least the definition/detection of wh-words and their syntactic position ). I built on the work that has been done on wh-words in CSL content questions (especially Pospíšilová 2012, Hronová 2002) and I systematize some data elicited from CSL online dictionary. At the end of the talk, I outline the way towards relativization in CSL using preliminary data obtained at my sessions with a native Deaf informant.
ER  -

STRACHOŇOVÁ, Hana. From questions to relatives in Czech Sign Language. In \textit{Relatives interrogatives alternatives, 13-15 November 2019, Prague}. 2019.

Přehled o publikaci