Judicial Dialogue in Action: Making Sense of the Risk of
Absconding  in the Return Procedure

C 2020

Judicial Dialogue in Action: Making Sense of the Risk of Absconding in the Return Procedure

MORARU, Madalina Bianca

Základní údaje

Originální název

Judicial Dialogue in Action: Making Sense of the Risk of Absconding in the Return Procedure

Autoři

MORARU, Madalina Bianca (642 Rumunsko, garant, domácí)

Vydání

1 edition. UK, Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union, od s. 125-149, 25 s. Modern Studies in European Law, 2020

Nakladatel

Hart

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Odkazy

Web nakladatele Repozitář MU

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/20:00115134

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

ISBN

978-1-5099-2295-6

Klíčová slova anglicky

risk of absconding;preliminary reference;horizontal judicial dialogue;return directive;pre-removal detention

Štítky

rivok, topvydavatel

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 8. 7. 2021 15:47, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

The concept of ‘risk of absconding’ has been introduced as a ground for immigration detention since 2008. Notwithstanding the abundant literature on immigration detention and the increasing European courts’ jurisprudence assessing the lawfulness of such measures at the domestic level, the substantive meaning of the term still appears “nebulous”. The purpose of this article is to shed light on its elements through a close examination of domestic and CJEU jurisprudence. It will be shown that the choices of State legislature have mostly been led by protectionist objectives, broadly defining the term, leading in several cases, particularly during the 2015 migration crisis, to systemic and arbitrary pre-removal detention. However, national courts are slowly but steadily starting to prioritise the EU general principles of legal certainty, individual assessment and proportionality, and fundamental rights protection when assessing the notion of ‘the risk of absconding’. Nevertheless, the interpretation and application of the ‘risk of absconding’ still poses difficulties for national courts. The Commission’s proposal for a recast of the Return Directive, while remedying one of the previous problems in the definition of the ‘risk of absconding’ – lack of definition of ‘objective criteria’ for assessing the risk of absconding, it nonetheless encourages wide spread use of pre-removal detention. In this context, the chapter analyses the contribution of judicial dialogue to ensuring respect for EU general principles of legality, certainty, proportionality, individual assessment and respect of irregular migrants’ fundamental rights.

Přiložené soubory

20201216113100761.pdf

Požádat o autorskou verzi souboru

Citovat

MORARU, Madalina Bianca. Judicial Dialogue in Action: Making Sense of the Risk of Absconding in the Return Procedure. In Moraru Madalina, Cornelisse Galina, and de Bruycker Philippe. Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union. 1 edition. UK: Hart, 2020, s. 125-149. Modern Studies in European Law. ISBN 978-1-5099-2295-6.

@inbook{1581938,
   author = {Moraru, Madalina Bianca},
   address = {UK},
   booktitle = {Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union},
   edition = {1 edition},
   editor = {Moraru Madalina, Cornelisse Galina, and de Bruycker Philippe},
   keywords = {risk of absconding;preliminary reference;horizontal judicial dialogue;return directive;pre-removal detention},
   howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {UK},
   isbn = {978-1-5099-2295-6},
   pages = {125-149},
   publisher = {Hart},
   title = {Judicial Dialogue in Action: Making Sense of the Risk of Absconding in the Return Procedure},
   url = {https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/law-and-judicial-dialogue-on-the-return-of-irregular-migrants-from-the-european-union-9781509922963/},
   year = {2020}
}

TY  - CHAP
ID  - 1581938
AU  - Moraru, Madalina Bianca
PY  - 2020
TI  - Judicial Dialogue in Action: Making Sense of the Risk of Absconding in the Return Procedure
VL  - Modern Studies in European Law
PB  - Hart
CY  - UK
SN  - 9781509922956
KW  - risk of absconding;preliminary reference;horizontal judicial dialogue;return directive;pre-removal detention
UR  - https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/law-and-judicial-dialogue-on-the-return-of-irregular-migrants-from-the-european-union-9781509922963/
N2  - The concept of ‘risk of absconding’ has been introduced as a ground for immigration detention since 2008. Notwithstanding the abundant literature on immigration detention and the increasing European courts’ jurisprudence assessing the lawfulness of such measures at the domestic level, the substantive meaning of the term still appears “nebulous”. The purpose of this article is to shed light on its elements through a close examination of domestic and CJEU jurisprudence. It will be shown that the choices of State legislature have mostly been led by protectionist objectives, broadly defining the term, leading in several cases, particularly during the 2015 migration crisis, to systemic and arbitrary pre-removal detention. However, national courts are slowly but steadily starting to prioritise the EU general principles of legal certainty, individual assessment and proportionality, and fundamental rights protection when assessing the notion of ‘the risk of absconding’. Nevertheless, the interpretation and application of the ‘risk of absconding’ still poses difficulties for national courts. The Commission’s proposal for a recast of the Return Directive, while remedying one of the previous problems in the definition of the ‘risk of absconding’ – lack of definition of ‘objective criteria’ for assessing the risk of absconding, it nonetheless encourages wide spread use of pre-removal detention. In this context, the chapter analyses the contribution of judicial dialogue to ensuring respect for EU general principles of legality, certainty, proportionality, individual assessment and respect of irregular migrants’ fundamental rights.
ER  -

MORARU, Madalina Bianca. Judicial Dialogue in Action: Making Sense of the Risk of Absconding in the Return Procedure. In Moraru Madalina, Cornelisse Galina, and de Bruycker Philippe. \textit{Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union}. 1 edition. UK: Hart, 2020, s.~125-149. Modern Studies in European Law. ISBN~978-1-5099-2295-6.

Přehled o publikaci