SALMANTON-GARCIA, Jon, Danila SEIDEL, Philipp KOEHLER, Sibylle C. MELLINGHOFF, Raoul HERBRECHT, Nikolai KLIMKO, Zdeněk RÁČIL, Iker FALCES-ROMERO, Paul INGRAM, Angel BENITEZ-PENUELA, Jose RODRIGUEZ, Guillaume DESOUBEAUX, Aleksandra BARAC, Carolina GARCIA-VIDAL, Martin HOENIGL, Sanjay R. MEHTA, Matthew P. CHENG, Galina KLYASOVA, Werner J. HEINZ, Nousheen IQBAL, Robert KRAUSE, Helmut OSTERMANN, Olaf PENACK, Enrico SCHALK, Donald C. SHEPPARD, Birgit WILLINGER, Hilmar WISPLINGHOFF a J. Janne VEHRESCHILD. Matched-paired analysis of patients treated for invasive mucormycosis: standard treatment versus posaconazole new formulations (MoveOn). Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. OXFORD: Oxford University Press, roč. 74, č. 11, s. 3315-3327. ISSN 0305-7453. doi:10.1093/jac/dkz344. 2019.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Matched-paired analysis of patients treated for invasive mucormycosis: standard treatment versus posaconazole new formulations (MoveOn)
Autoři SALMANTON-GARCIA, Jon (276 Německo), Danila SEIDEL (276 Německo), Philipp KOEHLER (276 Německo), Sibylle C. MELLINGHOFF (276 Německo), Raoul HERBRECHT (250 Francie), Nikolai KLIMKO (643 Rusko), Zdeněk RÁČIL (203 Česká republika, domácí), Iker FALCES-ROMERO (724 Španělsko), Paul INGRAM (40 Rakousko), Angel BENITEZ-PENUELA (170 Kolumbie), Jose RODRIGUEZ (170 Kolumbie), Guillaume DESOUBEAUX (250 Francie), Aleksandra BARAC (688 Srbsko), Carolina GARCIA-VIDAL (724 Španělsko), Martin HOENIGL (840 Spojené státy), Sanjay R. MEHTA (840 Spojené státy), Matthew P. CHENG (124 Kanada), Galina KLYASOVA (643 Rusko), Werner J. HEINZ (276 Německo), Nousheen IQBAL (586 Pákistán), Robert KRAUSE (40 Rakousko), Helmut OSTERMANN (276 Německo), Olaf PENACK (276 Německo), Enrico SCHALK (276 Německo), Donald C. SHEPPARD (124 Kanada), Birgit WILLINGER (40 Rakousko), Hilmar WISPLINGHOFF (276 Německo) a J. Janne VEHRESCHILD (276 Německo, garant).
Vydání Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, OXFORD, Oxford University Press, 2019, 0305-7453.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 30303 Infectious Diseases
Stát vydavatele Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW URL
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 5.439
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14110/19:00112622
Organizační jednotka Lékařská fakulta
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkz344
UT WoS 000498167700027
Klíčová slova anglicky LIPOSOMAL AMPHOTERICIN-B; MYCOSES STUDY-GROUP; TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION; TABLET FORMULATION; FUNGAL-INFECTIONS; ORAL TABLET; PHARMACOKINETICS; THERAPY; SAFETY
Štítky 14110212, rivok
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Změněno: 20. 1. 2020 12:42.
Anotace
Background: First-line antifungal treatment for invasive mucormycosis (IM) consists of liposomal amphotericin B. Salvage treatment options are limited and often based on posaconazole oral suspension. With the approval of posaconazole new formulations, patients could benefit from improved pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability. Objectives: Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of posaconazole new formulations for IM treatment. Methods: We performed a case-matched analysis with proven or probable IM patients from the FungiScope (R) Registry. First-line posaconazole new formulations (1st-POSnew) and first-line amphotericin B plus posaconazole new formulations (1st-AMB+POSnew) cases were matched with first-line amphotericin B-based (1st-AMB) treatment controls. Salvage posaconazole new formulations (SAL-POSnew) cases were matched with salvage posaconazole oral suspension (SAL-POSsusp) controls. Each case was matched with up to three controls (based on severity, haematological/oncological malignancy, surgery and/or renal dysfunction). Results: Five patients receiving 1st-POSnew, 18 receiving 1st-AMB+POSnew and 22 receiving SAL-POSnew were identified. By day 42, a favourable response was reported for 80.0% (n=4/5) of patients receiving 1st-POSnew, for 27.8% (n=5/18) receiving 1st-AMB+POSnew and for 50.0% (n=11/22) receiving SAL-POSnew. Day 42 all-cause mortality of patients receiving posaconazole new formulations was lower compared with controls [20.0% (n=1/5) in 1st-POSnew versus 53.3% (n=8/15) in 1st-AMB; 33.3% (n=6/18) in 1st-AMB+POSnew versus 52.0% (n=26/50) in 1st-AMB; and 0.0% (n=0/22) in SAL-POSnew versus 4.4% (n=2/45) in SAL-POSsusp]. Conclusions: Posaconazole new formulations were effective in terms of treatment response and associated mortality of IM. While posaconazole new formulations may be an alternative for treatment of IM, the limited sample size of our study calls for a cautious interpretation of these observations.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 19. 4. 2024 06:15