2019
First-line therapy for T cell lymphomas: a retrospective population-based analysis of 906 T cell lymphoma patients
JANÍKOVÁ, Andrea; Renata CHLOUPKOVÁ; Vit CAMPR; Pavel KLENER; Jitka HAMOUZOVA et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
First-line therapy for T cell lymphomas: a retrospective population-based analysis of 906 T cell lymphoma patients
Autoři
JANÍKOVÁ, Andrea; Renata CHLOUPKOVÁ; Vit CAMPR; Pavel KLENER; Jitka HAMOUZOVA; David BELADA; Vit PROCHAZKA; Robert PYTLIK; Jan PIRNOS; Juraj DURAS; Heidi MOCIKOVA; Zbyněk BORTLÍČEK; Natasa KOPALOVA; Jiří MAYER a Marek TRNENY
Vydání
Annals of hematology, New York, Springer Verlag, 2019, 0939-5555
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30205 Hematology
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.904
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/19:00112767
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
T cell lymphoma; Auto-SCT; Etoposide; Prognosis
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 11. 5. 2020 13:26, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTLs) have a globally poor prognosis. The CHOP regimen shows insufficient efficacy; first-line consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) is a promising strategy but has never been confirmed by randomized data. We analyzed retrospectively 906 patients diagnosed with PTL between 1999 and 2015. Chemotherapy was given to 862 patients, and 412 of them were <60years. In this subset, we compared induction with CHOP (n=113) vs. CHOEP (n=68) and tested auto-SCT (n=79) vs. no SCT (n=73) in the intent-to-treat analysis. The median age of the whole cohort at diagnosis was 60years (range; 18-91); the median follow-up was 4.3years (range; 0.1-17.8). A shorter overall survival (OS) was associated with the male gender, age >= 60years, stage III/IV, performance status >= 2, bulky tumor >= 10cm, and elevated LDH. CHOEP induction showed a better 5-year PFS (25.0% vs. 32.9%; p.001), and 5-year OS (65.6% vs. 47.6%; p.008) than CHOP. Auto-SCT compared to no SCT brought a 5-year OS of 49.2% vs. 59.5% (p.187). Auto-SCT did not influence the OS in low-risk or low-intermediate risk PTLs. The high-intermediate and high-risk IPIs displayed a worse 5-year OS in auto-SCT arm (17.7% vs.46.2%; p.049); however, 73.9% of the patients never received planned auto-SCT. Our population-based analysis showed the superiority of CHOEP over CHOP in first-line treatment. We confirm the 5-year OS of around 50% in PTLs undergoing auto-SCT. However, the intended auto-SCT could not be given in 73.9% of the high-risk PTLs.