The good, the bad and the ugly: framing debates on nature in a
One Health community

J 2019

The good, the bad and the ugly: framing debates on nature in a One Health community

ANTOINE-MOUSSIAUX, Nicolas; Luc JANSSENS DE BISTHOVEN; Stephane LEYENS; Timo ASSMUTH; Hans KEUNE et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

The good, the bad and the ugly: framing debates on nature in a One Health community

Autoři

ANTOINE-MOUSSIAUX, Nicolas; Luc JANSSENS DE BISTHOVEN; Stephane LEYENS; Timo ASSMUTH; Hans KEUNE; Jakob ZINSSTAG; Jean HUGÉ a Maarten Pieterjan VANHOVE

Vydání

Sustainability Science, Tokyo, Springer, 2019, 1862-4065

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10613 Zoology

Stát vydavatele

Japonsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 5.301

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/19:00112975

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Discourse; Health risks and benefits; Epistemology; Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity; Science-policy-society interface; Decision-making; Positional objectivity

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 27. 3. 2020 19:01, Mgr. Marie Novosadová Šípková, DiS.

Anotace

V originále

Originating in medical and veterinary spheres, the One Health concept stands as an open call for collaboration also between these disciplines or professions and those of environmental and social science. However, the communities of practice in question show uneasy or under-developed collaborations, due to a variety of factors. We argue that an important factor is the way issues are raised and questions are formulated, i.e., their framing. Based on complementary perspectives on health and knowledge, this overview provides an inter- and trans-disciplinary analysis of the role of the framing of << nature >> in One Health discourses as a barrier or a facilitator to collaboration, as revealed by the scientific literature. We find that the lack of reflection by scientists about the framing under which they operate appears as a major factor of misunderstanding between disciplines, and a barrier for inter- and trans-disciplinary solutions to improve management of health risks and benefits. Hence, to build such solutions, framing will have to be a conscious and repeated step in the process, acknowledging and explaining the diversity of viewpoints and values. The interdisciplinary dialogues inherent in this process promote translation between scientific domains, policy-makers and citizens, with a critical but pluralistic recourse to various framings of health risks and benefits associated with nature, and a deep awareness of their practical and ethical consequences.

Citovat

ANTOINE-MOUSSIAUX, Nicolas; Luc JANSSENS DE BISTHOVEN; Stephane LEYENS; Timo ASSMUTH; Hans KEUNE; Jakob ZINSSTAG; Jean HUGÉ a Maarten Pieterjan VANHOVE. The good, the bad and the ugly: framing debates on nature in a One Health community. Sustainability Science. Tokyo: Springer, 2019, roč. 14, č. 6, s. 1729-1738. ISSN 1862-4065. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00674-z.

@article{1623504,
   author = {AntoineandMoussiaux, Nicolas and Janssens de Bisthoven, Luc and Leyens, Stephane and Assmuth, Timo and Keune, Hans and Zinsstag, Jakob and Hugé, Jean and Vanhove, Maarten Pieterjan},
   article_location = {Tokyo},
   article_number = {6},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00674-z},
   keywords = {Discourse; Health risks and benefits; Epistemology; Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity; Science-policy-society interface; Decision-making; Positional objectivity},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1862-4065},
   journal = {Sustainability Science},
   title = {The good, the bad and the ugly: framing debates on nature in a One Health community},
   url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11625-019-00674-z},
   volume = {14},
   year = {2019}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1623504
AU  - Antoine-Moussiaux, Nicolas - Janssens de Bisthoven, Luc - Leyens, Stephane - Assmuth, Timo - Keune, Hans - Zinsstag, Jakob - Hugé, Jean - Vanhove, Maarten Pieterjan
PY  - 2019
TI  - The good, the bad and the ugly: framing debates on nature in a One Health community
JF  - Sustainability Science
VL  - 14
IS  - 6
SP  - 1729-1738
EP  - 1729-1738
PB  - Springer
SN  - 18624065
KW  - Discourse
KW  - Health risks and benefits
KW  - Epistemology
KW  - Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity
KW  - Science-policy-society interface
KW  - Decision-making
KW  - Positional objectivity
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11625-019-00674-z
L2  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11625-019-00674-z
N2  - Originating in medical and veterinary spheres, the One Health concept stands as an open call for collaboration also between these disciplines or professions and those of environmental and social science. However, the communities of practice in question show uneasy or under-developed collaborations, due to a variety of factors. We argue that an important factor is the way issues are raised and questions are formulated, i.e., their framing. Based on complementary perspectives on health and knowledge, this overview provides an inter- and trans-disciplinary analysis of the role of the framing of << nature >> in One Health discourses as a barrier or a facilitator to collaboration, as revealed by the scientific literature. We find that the lack of reflection by scientists about the framing under which they operate appears as a major factor of misunderstanding between disciplines, and a barrier for inter- and trans-disciplinary solutions to improve management of health risks and benefits. Hence, to build such solutions, framing will have to be a conscious and repeated step in the process, acknowledging and explaining the diversity of viewpoints and values. The interdisciplinary dialogues inherent in this process promote translation between scientific domains, policy-makers and citizens, with a critical but pluralistic recourse to various framings of health risks and benefits associated with nature, and a deep awareness of their practical and ethical consequences.
ER  -

ANTOINE-MOUSSIAUX, Nicolas; Luc JANSSENS DE BISTHOVEN; Stephane LEYENS; Timo ASSMUTH; Hans KEUNE; Jakob ZINSSTAG; Jean HUGÉ a Maarten Pieterjan VANHOVE. The good, the bad and the ugly: framing debates on nature in a One Health community. \textit{Sustainability Science}. Tokyo: Springer, 2019, roč.~14, č.~6, s.~1729-1738. ISSN~1862-4065. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00674-z.

Přehled o publikaci