Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept

J 2020

Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept

LOUIS, Elan D.; Martin BAREŠ; Julian BENITO-LEON; Stanley FAHN; Steven J. FRUCHT et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept

Autoři

LOUIS, Elan D.; Martin BAREŠ; Julian BENITO-LEON; Stanley FAHN; Steven J. FRUCHT; Joseph JANKOVIC; William G. ONDO; Pramod K. PAL a Eng-King TAN

Vydání

Lancet Neurology, London, UK, Elsevier, 2020, 1474-4422

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30210 Clinical neurology

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 44.182

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/20:00115427

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9

UT WoS

000514832700023

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-85079548830

Klíčová slova anglicky

CONSENSUS STATEMENT; HEAD TREMOR; DISORDER; DYSTONIA; PREVALENCE; DEMENTIA; NETWORK; DECLINE; DISEASE

Štítky

14110127, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 19. 3. 2020 13:50, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

In addition to redefining essential tremor (ET), the 2018 consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on tremor coined a new term: essential tremor-plus (ET-plus). This term is uncertainly defined as tremor with the characteristics of ET, with additional neurological signs of uncertain clinical significance. If ET-plus had been defined on the basis of a difference in underlying pathology or an appreciable difference in prognosis, it would have a valid, scientific rationale, as does the term Parkinson-plus. However, there is no such evidence, so the basis for the term is questionable. In fact, ET-plus might only represent a state condition (ie, patients with ET might develop these additional clinical features when the disease is at a more advanced stage). We caution against coining new terms that are not supported by a firm scientific basis and encourage research into the creation of essential tremor subsets that are defined with respect to differences in underlying causes or pathophysiology.

Citovat

LOUIS, Elan D.; Martin BAREŠ; Julian BENITO-LEON; Stanley FAHN; Steven J. FRUCHT; Joseph JANKOVIC; William G. ONDO; Pramod K. PAL a Eng-King TAN. Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept. Lancet Neurology. London, UK: Elsevier, 2020, roč. 19, č. 3, s. 266-270. ISSN 1474-4422. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9.

@article{1637476,
   author = {Louis, Elan D. and Bareš, Martin and BenitoandLeon, Julian and Fahn, Stanley and Frucht, Steven J. and Jankovic, Joseph and Ondo, William G. and Pal, Pramod K. and Tan, EngandKing},
   article_location = {London, UK},
   article_number = {3},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9},
   keywords = {CONSENSUS STATEMENT; HEAD TREMOR; DISORDER; DYSTONIA; PREVALENCE; DEMENTIA; NETWORK; DECLINE; DISEASE},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1474-4422},
   journal = {Lancet Neurology},
   title = {Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept},
   url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9},
   volume = {19},
   year = {2020}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1637476
AU  - Louis, Elan D. - Bareš, Martin - Benito-Leon, Julian - Fahn, Stanley - Frucht, Steven J. - Jankovic, Joseph - Ondo, William G. - Pal, Pramod K. - Tan, Eng-King
PY  - 2020
TI  - Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept
JF  - Lancet Neurology
VL  - 19
IS  - 3
SP  - 266-270
EP  - 266-270
PB  - Elsevier
SN  - 14744422
KW  - CONSENSUS STATEMENT
KW  - HEAD TREMOR
KW  - DISORDER
KW  - DYSTONIA
KW  - PREVALENCE
KW  - DEMENTIA
KW  - NETWORK
KW  - DECLINE
KW  - DISEASE
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9
L2  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9
N2  - In addition to redefining essential tremor (ET), the 2018 consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on tremor coined a new term: essential tremor-plus (ET-plus). This term is uncertainly defined as tremor with the characteristics of ET, with additional neurological signs of uncertain clinical significance. If ET-plus had been defined on the basis of a difference in underlying pathology or an appreciable difference in prognosis, it would have a valid, scientific rationale, as does the term Parkinson-plus. However, there is no such evidence, so the basis for the term is questionable. In fact, ET-plus might only represent a state condition (ie, patients with ET might develop these additional clinical features when the disease is at a more advanced stage). We caution against coining new terms that are not supported by a firm scientific basis and encourage research into the creation of essential tremor subsets that are defined with respect to differences in underlying causes or pathophysiology.
ER  -

LOUIS, Elan D.; Martin BAREŠ; Julian BENITO-LEON; Stanley FAHN; Steven J. FRUCHT; Joseph JANKOVIC; William G. ONDO; Pramod K. PAL a Eng-King TAN. Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept. \textit{Lancet Neurology}. London, UK: Elsevier, 2020, roč.~19, č.~3, s.~266-270. ISSN~1474-4422. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9.

Přehled o publikaci