Revival of a Cancelled Legal Regulation in Bohemia, Moravia and
Silesia and in Slovakia

J 2019

Revival of a Cancelled Legal Regulation in Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia and in Slovakia

KOUDELKA, Zdeněk a Aleš VÁŇA

Základní údaje

Originální název

Revival of a Cancelled Legal Regulation in Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia and in Slovakia

Název česky

Obživnutí zrušeného právního předpisu v Čechách, na Moravě, Slezsku a Slovensku

Autoři

KOUDELKA, Zdeněk a Aleš VÁŇA

Vydání

Law and State, Nur-sultan (Astana) Kazachstán, Univerzita KAZGJUU, 2019, 2307-521X

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Kazachstán

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Open access časopisu

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/19:00113690

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

Klíčová slova česky

Ústavní soud; zrušení právního předpisu; obživnutí právního předpisu.

Klíčová slova anglicky

Constitution; cancellation of the legal regulation; revival of the legal regulation; Constitutional Court; law-making; revival of legal regulations.

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 26. 6. 2020 10:32, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

ORIG CZ

V originále

The text deals with the revival of a legal regulation that was cancelled by a legal regulation that was subsequently cancelled by the Constitutional Court. It points out to the divided approach to the solution. The text results from the principles that unless the law explicitly stipulates otherwise, the cancelled legal regulation is not revived by cancelling the regulation that had cancelled it. The basic method used in the article is a comparison between the Czech Republic (Bohemia, Moravia, Silesia) and the Slovak Republic. The timeliness of the article is given by the fact that there is no uniform opinion on the solution of the problem and different solutions are adopted in individual cases. This undermines and weakens the principle of legal certainty. The revival of a cancelled legal regulation is possible, if the constitution and the law explicitly stipulate so, which is not the case of the legal system in Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia. The cancelation effects of a judgment of the constitutional court are for the future, not the past, otherwise it would be unconstitutional retroactivity. In Slovakia, the issue is solved by a legal directive regulating differently the consequences of derogation of a legal regulation (no revival) and its mere amendments or completions (revival). Unless the positive law states otherwise, there is no reason to adopt a different attitude to the consequences of the cancelation of a legal regulation by a legislator or by the constitutional court. Yet, it must be reminded that the constitutional court is not a positive law-maker and the revival of a legal regulation alone represents law-making.

Česky

Text se zabývá obživnutím právního předpisu, který byl zrušen právním předpisem, jenž byl následně zrušen Ústavním soudem. Poukazuje na nejednotný přístup k řešení. Text vychází ze zásady, že pokud výslovně právo nestanoví jinak, zrušený právní předpis neobživne tím, že se zruší předpis, který jej zrušil.

Citovat

KOUDELKA, Zdeněk a Aleš VÁŇA. Revival of a Cancelled Legal Regulation in Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia and in Slovakia. Law and State. Nur-sultan (Astana) Kazachstán: Univerzita KAZGJUU, 2019, roč. 2019, č. 4, s. 50-64. ISSN 2307-521X.

@article{1647476,
   author = {Koudelka, Zdeněk and Váňa, Aleš},
   article_location = {Nur-sultan (Astana) Kazachstán},
   article_number = {4},
   keywords = {Constitution; cancellation of the legal regulation; revival of the legal regulation; Constitutional Court; law-making; revival of legal regulations.},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {2307-521X},
   journal = {Law and State},
   title = {Revival of a Cancelled Legal Regulation in Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia and in Slovakia},
   url = {http://km.kazguu.kz/uploads/files/4%20%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C%D1%8F%20-%20Zden%C4%9Bk%20Koudelka%20(Czech%20Republic%2C%20Brno)%2C%20Ale%C5%A1%20V%C3%A1%C5%88a%20(Czech%20Republic%2C%20Karlovy%20Vary).pdf},
   volume = {2019},
   year = {2019}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1647476
AU  - Koudelka, Zdeněk - Váňa, Aleš
PY  - 2019
TI  - Revival of a Cancelled Legal Regulation in Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia and in Slovakia
JF  - Law and State
VL  - 2019
IS  - 4
SP  - 50-64
EP  - 50-64
PB  - Univerzita KAZGJUU
SN  - 2307521X
KW  - Constitution
KW  - cancellation of the legal regulation
KW  - revival of the legal regulation
KW  - Constitutional Court
KW  - law-making
KW  - revival of legal regulations.
UR  - http://km.kazguu.kz/uploads/files/4%20%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C%D1%8F%20-%20Zden%C4%9Bk%20Koudelka%20(Czech%20Republic%2C%20Brno)%2C%20Ale%C5%A1%20V%C3%A1%C5%88a%20(Czech%20Republic%2C%20Karlovy%20Vary).pdf
L2  - http://km.kazguu.kz/uploads/files/4%20%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C%D1%8F%20-%20Zden%C4%9Bk%20Koudelka%20(Czech%20Republic%2C%20Brno)%2C%20Ale%C5%A1%20V%C3%A1%C5%88a%20(Czech%20Republic%2C%20Karlovy%20Vary).pdf
N2  - The text deals with the revival of a legal regulation that was cancelled by a legal regulation that was subsequently cancelled by the Constitutional Court. It points out to the divided approach to the solution. The text results from the principles that unless the law explicitly stipulates otherwise, the cancelled legal regulation is not revived by cancelling the regulation that had cancelled it. The basic method used in the article is a comparison between the Czech Republic (Bohemia, Moravia, Silesia) and the Slovak Republic. The timeliness of the article is given by the fact that there is no uniform opinion on the solution of the problem and different solutions are adopted in individual cases. This undermines and weakens the principle of legal certainty. The revival of a cancelled legal regulation is possible, if the constitution and the law explicitly stipulate so, which is not the case of the legal system in Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia. The cancelation effects of a judgment of the constitutional court are for the future, not the past, otherwise it would be unconstitutional retroactivity. In Slovakia, the issue is solved by a legal directive regulating differently the consequences of derogation of a legal regulation (no revival) and its mere amendments or completions (revival). Unless the positive law states otherwise, there is no reason to adopt a different attitude to the consequences of the cancelation of a legal regulation by a legislator or by the constitutional court. Yet, it must be reminded that the constitutional court is not a positive law-maker and the revival of a legal regulation alone represents law-making.
ER  -

KOUDELKA, Zdeněk a Aleš VÁŇA. Revival of a Cancelled Legal Regulation in Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia and in Slovakia. \textit{Law and State}. Nur-sultan (Astana) Kazachstán: Univerzita KAZGJUU, 2019, roč.~2019, č.~4, s.~50-64. ISSN~2307-521X.

Přehled o publikaci