J 2016

High-Speed Rail for Central and Eastern European Countries: A Conference Report

JANDOVÁ, Monika; Zdeněk TOMEŠ a Christopher Alfred NASH

Základní údaje

Originální název

High-Speed Rail for Central and Eastern European Countries: A Conference Report

Autoři

JANDOVÁ, Monika; Zdeněk TOMEŠ a Christopher Alfred NASH

Vydání

REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, DE GRUYTER OPEN LTD, BOGUMILA ZUGA 32A ST, 01-811 WARSAW, POLAND, 2016, 1213-2446

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50202 Applied Economics, Econometrics

Stát vydavatele

Polsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14560/16:00113834

Organizační jednotka

Ekonomicko-správní fakulta

EID Scopus

Klíčová slova anglicky

Central and Eastern Europe; demand forecast; ex-ante evaluations; economic geography; high-speed rail
Změněno: 11. 5. 2020 10:21, Mgr. Daniela Marcollová

Anotace

V originále

The European transport strategy promotes the role of railways and expects that the key role in passenger transport should be played by high-speed rail (HSR). Although the core network of high-speed lines has already been built and is operating in Western Europe, there has been little coverage so far in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). The aim of the conference " High-Speed Rail for CEE Countries" that took place in Prague in June 2016 was to put together academics, policy-makers, and practitioners interested in HSR and to formulate recommendations for CEE countries based on West European countries' experience. Based on the conference presentations and subsequent discussion, the following conclusions were formulated. Firstly, there are many crucial differences in national HSR build-up and operation, which means that former experience of Western Europe is not directly applicable to CEE countries. Secondly, in comparing presentations discussing experiences in France, Britain, Italy, and Germany, it was concluded that the German approach-upgrading existing lines where possible and only building new lines for bottleneck sections-was the most likely appropriate solution in CEE. Lastly, CEE has the additional problem of many border crossings, with a reduction of traffic in comparison with purely domestic routes, and this effect has to be taken into account.