2020
Central Pathology Review in SENTIX, a Prospective Observational International Study on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer (ENGOT-CX2)
NEMEJCOVA, K.; R. KOCIAN; C. KOHLER; Jiří JARKOVSKÝ; J. KLAT et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Central Pathology Review in SENTIX, a Prospective Observational International Study on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer (ENGOT-CX2)
Autoři
NEMEJCOVA, K.; R. KOCIAN; C. KOHLER; Jiří JARKOVSKÝ ORCID; J. KLAT; A. BERJON; R. PILKA; B. SEHNAL; B. GIL-IBANEZ; E. LUPO; A. PETIZ; O. A. SANCHEZ; P. KASCAK; F. MARTINELLI; A. BUDA; J. PRESL; M. BARAHONA; L. VAN LONHUIJZEN; W. SZATKOWSKI; Luboš MINÁŘ; M. PAKIZ; P. HAVELKA; C. ZORRERO; M. MISIEK; L. C. SNYMAN; D. WYDRA; I. VERGOTE; A. VINNYTSKA; M. REDECHA; M. MICHAL; S. TINGULSTAD; B. KIPP; G. SZEWCZYK; R. TOTH; F. J .D. GARCIA; P. J. C. MARTIN; R. POKA; K. TAMUSSINO; M. LUYCKX; M. FASTREZ; J. C. STARINGER; A. GERMANOVA; A. PLAIKNER; S. BAJSOVA; P. DUNDR; N. MALLMANN-GOTTSCHALK a D. CIBULA
Vydání
Cancers, BASEL, MDPI, 2020, 2072-6694
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30204 Oncology
Stát vydavatele
Švýcarsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 6.639
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/20:00116028
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000539246000056
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85085039460
Klíčová slova anglicky
sentinel lymph node; cervical cancer; metastases
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 12. 5. 2021 13:16, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
The quality of pathological assessment is crucial for the safety of patients with cervical cancer if pelvic lymph node dissection is to be replaced by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Central pathology review of SLN pathological ultrastaging was conducted in the prospective SENTIX/European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial (ENGOT)-CX2 study. All specimens from at least two patients per site were submitted for the central review. For cases with major or critical deviations, the sites were requested to submit all samples from all additional patients for second-round assessment. From the group of 300 patients, samples from 83 cases from 37 sites were reviewed in the first round. Minor, major, critical, and no deviations were identified in 28%, 19%, 14%, and 39% of cases, respectively. Samples from 26 patients were submitted for the second-round review, with only two major deviations found. In conclusion, a high rate of major or critical deviations was identified in the first round of the central pathology review (28% of samples). This reflects a substantial heterogeneity in current practice, despite trial protocol requirements. The importance of the central review conducted prospectively at the early phase of the trial is demonstrated by a substantial improvement of SLN ultrastaging quality in the second-round review.