2020
Is variable plot size a serious constraint in broad–scale vegetation studies? A case study on fens
PETERKA, Tomáš, Vít SYROVÁTKA, Daniel DÍTĚ, Petra HÁJKOVÁ, Monika HRUBANOVÁ et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Is variable plot size a serious constraint in broad–scale vegetation studies? A case study on fens
Autoři
PETERKA, Tomáš (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Vít SYROVÁTKA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Daniel DÍTĚ (703 Slovensko), Petra HÁJKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Monika HRUBANOVÁ (203 Česká republika), Martin JIROUŠEK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Zuzana PLESKOVÁ (703 Slovensko, domácí), Patrícia SINGH (703 Slovensko, domácí), Anna ŠÍMOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Eva ŠMERDOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Michal HÁJEK (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání
Journal of Vegetation Science, Hoboken, Wiley, 2020, 1100-9233
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
10611 Plant sciences, botany
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.685
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14310/20:00114259
Organizační jednotka
Přírodovědecká fakulta
UT WoS
000530930600001
Klíčová slova anglicky
fens; phytosociology; plot size; scale; specialist plants; species–area relationship; vegetation classification; vegetation plot; vegetation survey; wetlands
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 3. 11. 2020 16:39, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.
Anotace
V originále
Filtering vegetation plot records according to sampling size is an essential methodological step in vegetation studies. In fens, the variation of traditionally used plot sizes seems to limit continental-scale syntheses following the Braun-Blanquet approach. Which plot sizes harbour the analogous number of habitat specialists (i.e., diagnostic/indicator species) and capture the main compositional gradients identically? The data set of fen vegetation plot records was compiled using large databases and categorised into four distinct habitats. For each habitat, semi-log species–area curves of specialists and other species were fitted using generalised additive models (GAM). In addition, we surveyed 72 sites in a series of plot sizes (0.07, 0.25, 1, 4, 16 m2) where we applied, separately for each plot size, Non-Metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling (NMDS) and compared the resulting patterns with Procrustes analysis. Consistently across different fen habitats, the species–area curves of specialists increased steeply up to the plot size of 1 m2, while increasing negligibly in the plot size range of 1–25 m2. In contrast, the species–area curves of other species displayed mostly linear to linear-exponential trends. NMDS ordinations of medium (1 and 4 m2) and large plots (16 m2) were the most congruent, while the patterns captured in the ordination of the smallest plots (0.07 m2) differed most from the others. In fens, plot sizes of at least 1 m2 describe sufficiently the broad-scale pattern in specialists’ diversity as well as the main environmental gradients. The range of plot sizes of 1–25 m2 may be safely merged in broad-scale analyses of fen vegetation without introducing substantial bias, at least when compared with other possible uncertainty sources.
Návaznosti
GX19-28491X, projekt VaV |
| ||
MUNI/A/0979/2017, interní kód MU |
|