Egyptian fruit bats do not preferentially roost with their
relatives

J 2020

Egyptian fruit bats do not preferentially roost with their relatives

BACHOREC, Erik; Ivan HORACEK; Pavel HULVA; Adam KONEČNÝ; Radek LUCAN et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Egyptian fruit bats do not preferentially roost with their relatives

Autoři

BACHOREC, Erik; Ivan HORACEK; Pavel HULVA; Adam KONEČNÝ; Radek LUCAN; Petr JEDLICKA; Wael SHOHDI; Simon RERUCHA; Mounir ABI-SAID a Tomáš BARTONIČKA

Vydání

Journal of Zoology, Hoboken, Wiley, 2020, 0952-8369

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10613 Zoology

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.322

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/20:00113933

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

roosting; roosting behaviour; associations; relatedness; Rousettus aegyptiacus; fruit bats; network analysis; social dynamics

Štítky

14314020, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 12. 10. 2020 11:29, Mgr. Marie Novosadová Šípková, DiS.

Anotace

V originále

Roosts provide bats with place for daytime sheltering, protection from weather and predators, mating, and social interaction. Movements between multiple roosts are often necessary, either due to limited roost life, changes in roost conditions or demands at different times of the year. Information transfer is an important contributor to day-roosting behaviour and typically exhibits non-random social assortment dynamics. Some individuals appear to explore and share roost discoveries more often than others, though it remains unclear whether associations are stronger between close relatives than less related individuals. In the present study, network analysis, in combination with genetic and spatial data, was used to explore the roosting behaviour of Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) within an isolated deme. Our results showed that the roosts had distinct core-periphery structure. The core of the winter roost network was represented by only two roosts, while in spring, the season of food scarcity, the core was represented by multiple roosts, suggesting their potential role as centres, where information about roosts and foraging sites is exchanged. We found no relationship between relatedness and roost sharing over two seasons. These results provide strong support that Egyptian fruit bats do not roost preferentially with relatives, in contrast to many animal populations where individuals preferentially associate with kin.

Návaznosti

IAA601110905, projekt VaV

Název: Evoluční biogeografie kaloně Rousettus aegyptiacus ve středozemní oblasti.

Investor: Akademie věd ČR, Evoluční biogeografie kaloně Rousettus aegyptiacus ve středozemní oblasti

MUNI/A/1098/2019, interní kód MU

Název: Výzkum Ekologických a Evolučních Principů na modelu obratlovců a jejich parazitů

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Výzkum Ekologických a Evolučních Principů na modelu obratlovců a jejich parazitů, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Citovat

BACHOREC, Erik; Ivan HORACEK; Pavel HULVA; Adam KONEČNÝ; Radek LUCAN; Petr JEDLICKA; Wael SHOHDI; Simon RERUCHA; Mounir ABI-SAID a Tomáš BARTONIČKA. Egyptian fruit bats do not preferentially roost with their relatives. Journal of Zoology. Hoboken: Wiley, 2020, roč. 312, č. 2, s. 111-121. ISSN 0952-8369. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12816.

@article{1674076,
   author = {Bachorec, Erik and Horacek, Ivan and Hulva, Pavel and Konečný, Adam and Lucan, Radek and Jedlicka, Petr and Shohdi, Wael and Rerucha, Simon and AbiandSaid, Mounir and Bartonička, Tomáš},
   article_location = {Hoboken},
   article_number = {2},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12816},
   keywords = {roosting; roosting behaviour; associations; relatedness; Rousettus aegyptiacus; fruit bats; network analysis; social dynamics},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0952-8369},
   journal = {Journal of Zoology},
   title = {Egyptian fruit bats do not preferentially roost with their relatives},
   url = {https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jzo.12816},
   volume = {312},
   year = {2020}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1674076
AU  - Bachorec, Erik - Horacek, Ivan - Hulva, Pavel - Konečný, Adam - Lucan, Radek - Jedlicka, Petr - Shohdi, Wael - Rerucha, Simon - Abi-Said, Mounir - Bartonička, Tomáš
PY  - 2020
TI  - Egyptian fruit bats do not preferentially roost with their relatives
JF  - Journal of Zoology
VL  - 312
IS  - 2
SP  - 111-121
EP  - 111-121
PB  - Wiley
SN  - 09528369
KW  - roosting
KW  - roosting behaviour
KW  - associations
KW  - relatedness
KW  - Rousettus aegyptiacus
KW  - fruit bats
KW  - network analysis
KW  - social dynamics
UR  - https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jzo.12816
L2  - https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jzo.12816
N2  - Roosts provide bats with place for daytime sheltering, protection from weather and predators, mating, and social interaction. Movements between multiple roosts are often necessary, either due to limited roost life, changes in roost conditions or demands at different times of the year. Information transfer is an important contributor to day-roosting behaviour and typically exhibits non-random social assortment dynamics. Some individuals appear to explore and share roost discoveries more often than others, though it remains unclear whether associations are stronger between close relatives than less related individuals. In the present study, network analysis, in combination with genetic and spatial data, was used to explore the roosting behaviour of Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) within an isolated deme. Our results showed that the roosts had distinct core-periphery structure. The core of the winter roost network was represented by only two roosts, while in spring, the season of food scarcity, the core was represented by multiple roosts, suggesting their potential role as centres, where information about roosts and foraging sites is exchanged. We found no relationship between relatedness and roost sharing over two seasons. These results provide strong support that Egyptian fruit bats do not roost preferentially with relatives, in contrast to many animal populations where individuals preferentially associate with kin.
ER  -

BACHOREC, Erik; Ivan HORACEK; Pavel HULVA; Adam KONEČNÝ; Radek LUCAN; Petr JEDLICKA; Wael SHOHDI; Simon RERUCHA; Mounir ABI-SAID a Tomáš BARTONIČKA. Egyptian fruit bats do not preferentially roost with their relatives. \textit{Journal of Zoology}. Hoboken: Wiley, 2020, roč.~312, č.~2, s.~111-121. ISSN~0952-8369. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12816.

Přehled o publikaci