D 2021

Non-repudiable provenance for clinical decision support systems

FAIRWEATHER, Elliot, Rudolf WITTNER, Martin CHAPMAN, Petr HOLUB, Vasa CURCIN et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Non-repudiable provenance for clinical decision support systems

Autoři

FAIRWEATHER, Elliot, Rudolf WITTNER (703 Slovensko, domácí), Martin CHAPMAN, Petr HOLUB (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Vasa CURCIN

Vydání

Cham, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, od s. 165-182, 18 s. 2021

Nakladatel

Springer

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Stať ve sborníku

Obor

10201 Computer sciences, information science, bioinformatics

Stát vydavatele

Švýcarsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 0.402 v roce 2005

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14330/21:00120672

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta informatiky

ISBN

978-3-030-80959-1

ISSN

Klíčová slova anglicky

data provenance;non-repudiation;health informatics;decision support systems

Štítky

Příznaky

Recenzováno
Změněno: 23. 5. 2022 14:17, RNDr. Pavel Šmerk, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Provenance templates are now a recognised methodology for the construction of data provenance records. Each template defines the provenance of a domain-specific action in abstract form, which may then be instantiated as required by a single call to the provenance template service. As data reliability and trustworthiness becomes a critical issue in an increasing number of domains, there is a corresponding need to ensure that the provenance of that data is non-repudiable. In this paper we contribute two new, complementary modules to our template model and implementation to produce non-repudiable data provenance. The first, a module that traces the operation of the provenance template service itself, and records a provenance trace of the construction of an object-level document, at the level of individual service calls. The second, a non-repudiation module that generates evidence for the data recorded about each call, annotates the service trace accordingly, and submits a representation of that evidence to a provider-agnostic notary service. We evaluate the applicability of our approach in the context of a clinical decision support system. We first define a policy to ensure the non-repudiation of evidence with respect to a security threat analysis in order to demonstrate the suitability of our solution. We then select three use cases from within a particular system, Consult, with contrasting data provenance recording requirements and analyse the subsequent performance of our prototype implementation against three different notary providers.