2020
Comparing Maintainability Index, SIG Method, and SQALE for Technical Debt Identification
STREČANSKÝ, Peter; Stanislav CHREN a Bruno ROSSIZákladní údaje
Originální název
Comparing Maintainability Index, SIG Method, and SQALE for Technical Debt Identification
Autoři
STREČANSKÝ, Peter; Stanislav CHREN a Bruno ROSSI
Vydání
Scientific programming, Hindawi, 2020, 1058-9244
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
10201 Computer sciences, information science, bioinformatics
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 1.025
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14330/20:00117521
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta informatiky
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Software Technical Debt; Software Maintenance; Software Quality; Maintainability Index; SIG Method; SQALE
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 15. 4. 2021 10:31, doc. Bruno Rossi, PhD
Anotace
V originále
There are many definitions of software Technical Debt (TD) that were proposed over time. While many techniques to measure TD emerged in recent times, there is still not a clear understanding about how different techniques compare when applied to software projects. The goal of this paper is to shed some light on this aspect, by comparing three techniques about TD identification that were proposed over time: (i) the Maintainability Index (MI), (ii) SIG TD models, and (iii) SQALE analysis. Considering 20 open source Python libraries, we compare the TD measurements time series in terms of trends and evolution according to different sets of releases (major, minor, and micro), to see if the perception of practitioners about TD evolution could be impacted. While all methods report generally growing trends of TD over time, there are different patterns. SQALE reports more periods of steady states compared to MI and SIG TD. MI is the method that reports more repayments of TD compared to the other methods. SIG TD and MI are the models that show more similarity in the way TD evolves, while SQALE and MI are less similar. The implications are that each method gives slightly a different perception about TD evolution.
Návaznosti
| CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000822, interní kód MU (Kód CEP: EF16_019/0000822) |
| ||
| EF16_019/0000822, projekt VaV |
|