J 2021

Development and psychometric property testing of a skin tear knowledge assessment instrument (OASES) in 37 countries

VAN TIGGELEN, H., P. ALVES, E. AYELLO, C. BAATH, S. BARANOSKI et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Development and psychometric property testing of a skin tear knowledge assessment instrument (OASES) in 37 countries

Autoři

VAN TIGGELEN, H., P. ALVES, E. AYELLO, C. BAATH, S. BARANOSKI, K. CAMPBELL, A. M. DUNK, M. GLOECKNER, H. HEVIA, S. HOLLOWAY, P. IDENSOHN, A. KARADAG, D. LANGEMO, K. LEBLANC, K. OUSEY, Andrea POKORNÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), M. ROMANELLI, V. L. C. D. SANTOS, S. SMET, A. WILLIAMS, K. WOO, A. VAN HECKE, S. VERHAEGHE a D. BEECKMAN (garant)

Vydání

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, HOBOKEN, WILEY, 2021, 0309-2402

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30307 Nursing

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 3.057

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/21:00120905

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

000597215400001

Klíčová slova anglicky

instrument development; knowledge; nursing; psychometrics; reliability; skin tear; validity

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 25. 3. 2021 07:35, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Aim To develop and psychometrically evaluate a skin tear knowledge assessment instrument (OASES). Design Prospective psychometric instrument validation study. Method The skin tear knowledge assessment instrument was developed based on a literature review and expert input (N = 19). Face and content validity were assessed in a two-round Delphi procedure by 10 international experts affiliated with the International Skin Tear Advisory Panel (ISTAP). The instrument was psychometrically tested in a convenience sample of 387 nurses in 37 countries (April-May 2020). Validity of the multiple-choice test items (item difficulty, discriminating index, quality of the response alternatives), construct validity, and test-retest reliability (stability) were analysed and evaluated in light of international reference standards. Results A 20-item instrument, covering six knowledge domains most relevant to skin tears, was designed. Content validity was established (CVI = 0.90-1.00). Item difficulty varied between 0.24 and 0.94 and the quality of the response alternatives between 0.01-0.52. The discriminating index was acceptable (0.19-0.77). Participants with a theoretically expected higher knowledge level had a significantly higher total score than participants with theoretically expected lower knowledge (p < .001). The 1-week test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.83 (95% CI = 0.78-0.86) for the full instrument and varied between 0.72 (95% CI = 0.64-0.79) and 0.85 (95% CI = 0.81-0.89) for the domains. Cohen's Kappa coefficients of the individual items ranged between 0.21 and 0.74. Conclusion The skin tear knowledge assessment instrument is supported by acceptable psychometric properties and can be applied in nursing education, research, and practice to assess knowledge of healthcare professionals about skin tears. Impact Prevention and treatment of skin tears are a challenge for healthcare professionals. The provision of adequate care is based on profound and up-to-date knowledge. None of the existing instruments to assess skin tear knowledge is psychometrically tested, nor up-to-date. OASES can be used worldwide to identify education, practice, and research needs and priorities related to skin tears in clinical practice.