J 2021

Tractography dissection variability: What happens when 42 groups dissect 14 white matter bundles on the same dataset?

SCHILLING, K. G., F. RHEAULT, L. PETIT, C. B. HANSEN, V. NATH et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Tractography dissection variability: What happens when 42 groups dissect 14 white matter bundles on the same dataset?

Autoři

SCHILLING, K. G. (garant), F. RHEAULT, L. PETIT, C. B. HANSEN, V. NATH, F. C. YEH, G. GIRARD, M. BARAKOVIC, J. RAFAEL-PATINO, T. YU, E. FISCHI-GOMEZ, M. PIZZOLATO, M. OCAMPO-PINEDA, S. SCHIAVI, E. J. CANALES-RODRIGUEZ, A. DADUCCI, C. GRANZIERA, G. INNOCENTI, J. P. THIRAN, L. MANCINI, S. WASTLING, S. COCOZZA, M. PETRACCA, G. PONTILLO, M. MANCINI, S. B. VOS, V. N. VAKHARIA, J. S. DUNCAN, H. MELERO, L. MANZANEDO, E. SANZ-MORALES, A. PENA-MELIAN, F. CALAMANTE, A. ATTYE, R. P. CABEEN, L. KOROBOVA, A. W. TOGA, A. A. VIJAYAKUMARI, D. PARKER, R. VERMA, A. RADWAN, S. SUNAERT, L. EMSELL, A. DE LUCA, A. LEEMANS, C. J. BAJADA, H. HAROON, H. AZADBAKHT, M. CHAMBERLAND, S. GENC, C. M. W. TAX, P. H. YEH, R. SRIKANCHANA, C. D. MCKNIGHT, J. Y. M. YANG, J. CHEN, C. E. KELLY, C. H. YEH, J. COCHEREAU, J.J . MALLER, T. WELTON, F. ALMAIRAC, K. K. SEUNARINE, C. A. CLARK, F. ZHANG, N. MAKRIS, A. GOLBY, Y. RATHI, L. J. O DONNELL, Y. H. XIA, D. B. AYDOGAN, Y. G. SHI, F. G. FERNANDES, M. RAEMAEKERS, S. WARRINGTON, S. MICHIELSE, A. RAMIREZ-MANZANARES, L. CONCHA, R. ARANDA, M. R. MERAZ, G. LERMA-USABIAGA, L. ROITMAN, L. S. FEKONJA, N. CALARCO, M.. JOSEPH, H. NAKUA, A. N. VOINESKOS, P. KARAN, G. GRENIER, J. H. LEGARRETA, N. ADLURU, V. A. NAIR, V. PRABHAKARAN, A. L. ALEXANDER, K. KAMAGATA, Y. SAITO, W. UCHIDA, C. ANDICA, M. ABE, R. G. BAYRAK, C. A. M. G. WHEELER-KINGSHOTT, E. D ANGELO, F. PALESI, G. SAVINI, N. ROLANDI, P. GUEVARA, J. HOUENOU, N. LOPEZ-LOPEZ, J. F. MANGIN, C. POUPON, C. ROMAN, A. VAZQUEZ, C. MAFFEI, M. ARANTES, J. P. ANDRADE, S. M. SILVA, V. D. CALHOUN, E. CAVERZASI, S. SACCO, M. LAURICELLA, F. PESTILLI, D. BULLOCK, Y. ZHAN, E. BRIGNONI-PEREZ, C. LEBEL, J. E. REYNOLDS, I. NESTRASIL, R. LABOUNEK, C. LENGLET, A. PAULSON, Štefánia AULICKÁ (703 Slovensko, domácí), S. R. HEILBRONNER, K. HEUER, B. Q. CHANDIO, J. GUAJE, W. TANG, E. GARYFALLIDIS, R. RAJA, A. W. ANDERSON, B. A. LANDMAN a M. DESCOTEAUX

Vydání

Neuroimage, San Diego, ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE, 2021, 1053-8119

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30103 Neurosciences

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 7.400

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/21:00121156

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

000696941000003

Klíčová slova anglicky

Tractography; Bundle segmentation; White matter; Fiber pathways; Dissection

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 15. 2. 2022 08:02, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

White matter bundle segmentation using diffusion MRI fiber tractography has become the method of choice to identify white matter fiber pathways in vivo in human brains. However, like other analyses of complex data, there is considerable variability in segmentation protocols and techniques. This can result in different reconstructions of the same intended white matter pathways, which directly affects tractography results, quantification, and interpretation. In this study, we aim to evaluate and quantify the variability that arises from different protocols for bundle segmentation. Through an open call to users of fiber tractography, including anatomists, clinicians, and algorithm developers, 42 independent teams were given processed sets of human whole-brain streamlines and asked to segment 14 white matter fascicles on six subjects. In total, we received 57 different bundle segmentation protocols, which enabled detailed volume-based and streamline-based analyses of agreement and disagreement among protocols for each fiber pathway. Results show that even when given the exact same sets of underlying streamlines, the variability across protocols for bundle segmentation is greater than all other sources of variability in the virtual dissection process, including variability within protocols and variability across subjects. In order to foster the use of tractography bundle dissection in routine clinical settings, and as a fundamental analytical tool, future endeavors must aim to resolve and reduce this heterogeneity. Although external validation is needed to verify the anatomical accuracy of bundle dissections, reducing heterogeneity is a step towards reproducible research and may be achieved through the use of standard nomenclature and definitions of white matter bundles and well-chosen constraints and decisions in the dissection process.