2021
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
AKL, E. A.; R. L. MORGAN; A. A. ROONEY; B. BEVERLY; S. V. KATIKREDDI et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
Autoři
AKL, E. A.; R. L. MORGAN; A. A. ROONEY; B. BEVERLY; S. V. KATIKREDDI; A. AGARWAL; B. S. ALPER; C. ALVA-DIAZ; L. AMATO; M. T. ANSARI; J. BROZEK; D. K. CHU; P. DAHM; A. J. DARZI; M. FALAVIGNA; G. GARTLEHNER; H. PARDO-HERNANDEZ; V. KING; Jitka KLUGAROVÁ; M. W. M. LANGENDAM; C. LOCKWOOD; M. MAMMEN; A. G. MATHIOUDAKIS; M. MCCAUL; J. J. MEERPOHL; S. MINOZZI; R. A. MUSTAFA; F. NONINO; T. PIGGOTT; A. QASEEM; J. RIVA; R. RODIN; N. SEKERCIOGLU; N. SKOETZ; G. TRAVERSY; K. THAYER a H. SCHUNEMANN
Vydání
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, NEW YORK, ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2021, 0895-4356
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30304 Public and environmental health
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 7.407
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00121173
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
GRADE; Urgent recommendation; Pandemic; Trustworthy guideline
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 25. 2. 2021 12:45, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Objectives: The aim of this study is to propose an approach for developing trustworthy recommendations as part of urgent responses (1-2 week) in the clinical, public health, and health systems fields. Study Design and Setting: We conducted a review of the literature, outlined a draft approach, refined the concept through iterative discussions, a workshop by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Rapid Guidelines project group, and obtained feedback from the larger Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group. Results: A request for developing recommendations within 2 week is the usual trigger for an urgent response. Although the approach builds on the general principles of trustworthy guideline development, we highlight the following steps: (1) assess the level of urgency; (2) assess feasibility; (3) set up the organizational logistics; (4) specify the question(s); (5) collect the information needed; (6) assess the adequacy of identified information; (7) develop the recommendations using one of the 4 potential approaches: adopt existing recommendations, adapt existing recommendations, develop new recommendations using existing adequate systematic review, or develop new recommendations using expert panel input; and (8) consider an updating plan. Conclusion: An urgent response for developing recommendations requires building a cohesive, skilled, and highly motivated multidisciplinary team with the necessary clinical, scientific, and methodological expertise; adapting to shifting needs; complying with the principles of transparency; and properly managing conflicts of interest. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.