2021
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
AKL, E. A., R. L. MORGAN, A. A. ROONEY, B. BEVERLY, S. V. KATIKREDDI et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
Autoři
AKL, E. A. (garant), R. L. MORGAN, A. A. ROONEY, B. BEVERLY, S. V. KATIKREDDI, A. AGARWAL, B. S. ALPER, C. ALVA-DIAZ, L. AMATO, M. T. ANSARI, J. BROZEK, D. K. CHU, P. DAHM, A. J. DARZI, M. FALAVIGNA, G. GARTLEHNER, H. PARDO-HERNANDEZ, V. KING, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), M. W. M. LANGENDAM, C. LOCKWOOD, M. MAMMEN, A. G. MATHIOUDAKIS, M. MCCAUL, J. J. MEERPOHL, S. MINOZZI, R. A. MUSTAFA, F. NONINO, T. PIGGOTT, A. QASEEM, J. RIVA, R. RODIN, N. SEKERCIOGLU, N. SKOETZ, G. TRAVERSY, K. THAYER a H. SCHUNEMANN
Vydání
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, NEW YORK, ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2021, 0895-4356
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30304 Public and environmental health
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 7.407
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00121173
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000608358000001
Klíčová slova anglicky
GRADE; Urgent recommendation; Pandemic; Trustworthy guideline
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 25. 2. 2021 12:45, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Objectives: The aim of this study is to propose an approach for developing trustworthy recommendations as part of urgent responses (1-2 week) in the clinical, public health, and health systems fields. Study Design and Setting: We conducted a review of the literature, outlined a draft approach, refined the concept through iterative discussions, a workshop by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Rapid Guidelines project group, and obtained feedback from the larger Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group. Results: A request for developing recommendations within 2 week is the usual trigger for an urgent response. Although the approach builds on the general principles of trustworthy guideline development, we highlight the following steps: (1) assess the level of urgency; (2) assess feasibility; (3) set up the organizational logistics; (4) specify the question(s); (5) collect the information needed; (6) assess the adequacy of identified information; (7) develop the recommendations using one of the 4 potential approaches: adopt existing recommendations, adapt existing recommendations, develop new recommendations using existing adequate systematic review, or develop new recommendations using expert panel input; and (8) consider an updating plan. Conclusion: An urgent response for developing recommendations requires building a cohesive, skilled, and highly motivated multidisciplinary team with the necessary clinical, scientific, and methodological expertise; adapting to shifting needs; complying with the principles of transparency; and properly managing conflicts of interest. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.