2021
Applicable Law to Infringement Disputes of the Right to Trade Names
PULLMANNOVÁ, HelenaZákladní údaje
Originální název
Applicable Law to Infringement Disputes of the Right to Trade Names
Název česky
Právo rozhodné ve sporech z porušení práva k obchodnímu jménu
Autoři
Vydání
BILETA 2021, 2021
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Prezentace na konferencích
Obor
50501 Law
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ne
Organizační jednotka
Právnická fakulta
Klíčová slova česky
Právo k obchodnímu jménu; právo rozhodné; mimosmluvní závazek; volba práva; dépeçage; CLIP Principles.
Klíčová slova anglicky
Right to Trade Name; Applicable Law; Non-contractual Obligation; Choice of Law; Dépeçage; CLIP Principles.
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam
Změněno: 15. 4. 2021 22:02, Mgr. Bc. Helena Pullmannová, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
When the entrepreneur's right to his trade name is violated, it is important to know answers to the questions under the law of which state claims of this way the injured entrepreneur (i.e., from non-contractual obligation) will be assessed and for which related questions thus determined law is decisive as well. These issues are mainly analysed in the light of the Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non contractual obligations (Rome II) and attention is beside other things also paid to the issue of the mosaic way of determining application law(s), especially the issue how to deal with the question whether the infringement, which was committed online, was committed on the territory of a particular state. Subsequently, the criteria formulated in the Rome II are compared with the criteria listed in the CLIP Principles (soft law) for the purpose to determine how much is the European Union point of view different from the (European) academic point of view. For the sake of completeness, the presentation mentions situations where the Rome II is not used to ascertain the applicable law. There in detail, the rules for determining applicable law under Czech law are analysed. Moreover, the presentation is introduced with a general consideration of the importance of classifying the "examined conduct" under lex fori as a legal act which sets a non contractual obligation arising from the infringement of the right to the trade name.