2021
Visceral fat area and cardiometabolic risk: The Kardiovize study
POLCROVÁ, Anna, Iuliia PAVLOVSKA, Geraldo A. Maranhao NETO, Šárka KUNZOVÁ, Maria M. INFANTE-GARCIA et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Visceral fat area and cardiometabolic risk: The Kardiovize study
Autoři
POLCROVÁ, Anna (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Iuliia PAVLOVSKA (804 Ukrajina, domácí), Geraldo A. Maranhao NETO (203 Česká republika), Šárka KUNZOVÁ (203 Česká republika), Maria M. INFANTE-GARCIA (862 Venezuela), Jose R. MEDINA-INOJOSA (840 Spojené státy), Francisco LOPEZ-JIMENEZ (840 Spojené státy), Jeffrey I. MECHANICK (840 Spojené státy), Ramfis NIETO-MARTINEZ (862 Venezuela), Gorazd Bernard STOKIN (203 Česká republika), Hynek PIKHART (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Juan P. GONZALEZ-RIVAS (840 Spojené státy)
Vydání
Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, OXFORD, ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2021, 1871-403X
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30308 Nutrition, Dietetics
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 5.214
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14310/21:00121420
Organizační jednotka
Přírodovědecká fakulta
UT WoS
000675529000010
Klíčová slova anglicky
Intra-abdominal fat; Cardiometabolic risk factors; Race factors
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 27. 1. 2022 22:15, Mgr. Michaela Hylsová, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
Background: Visceral fat is associated with adiposity-based complications. Bioimpedance measurement allows estimation of visceral fat area (VFA) in an easy manner. However, a validated cut-off value for VFA by bioimpedance associated with cardiometabolic risk is lacking in European population. Aim: To determine cut-off values of VFA measured via bioimpedance associated with cardiometabolic risk. Methods: Random cross-sectional Czech population-based sample of 25-64 years old subjects. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used and the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. The Cardiometabolic Disease Staging System (CMDS) was used to classify cardiometabolic risk: Stage 1 - 1 or 2 metabolic syndrome (MetS) components, without impaired fasting glucose (IFG); Stage 2 - MetS or IFG; Stage 3 - MetS with IFG; Stage 4 - type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease. Results: 2052 participants (54.5% females, median age 49 years) were included. Median VFA (inter-quartile range) were 82.2 cm(2) (54.8) in men and 89.8 cm(2) (55.6) in women. The best VFA cut-offs associated with Stage 1 in men and women were 71 cm(2)(sensitivity = 0.654; specificity = 0.427) and 83 cm(2) (sensitivity = 0.705; specificity = 0.556); Stage 2: 84 cm(2) (sensitivity = 0.673; specificity = 0.551) and 98 cm(2) (sensitivity = 0.702; specificity = 0.628); Stage 3: 90 cm(2) (sensitivity = 0.886; specificity = 0.605) and 109 cm(2) (sensitivity = 0.755; specificity = 0.704); Stage 4: 91 cm(2)(sensitivity = 0.625; specificity = 0.611) and 81cm(2) (sensitivity = 0.695; specificity = 0.448), respectively. Conclusion: A cut-off value of VFA of 71 cm(2) in men and 83 cm(2) in women exhibited the earliest stage of cardiometabolic risk, and 90 cm(2) in men and 109 cm(2) in women showed the best performance to detect risk.