Effects of in vitro metamorphosis on survival, growth, and
reproductive success of freshwater mussels

J 2021

Effects of in vitro metamorphosis on survival, growth, and reproductive success of freshwater mussels

DOUDA, Karel; Wendell R HAAG; Felipe ESCOBAR-CALDERON; Barbora VODÁKOVÁ; Martin REICHARD et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Effects of in vitro metamorphosis on survival, growth, and reproductive success of freshwater mussels

Autoři

DOUDA, Karel; Wendell R HAAG; Felipe ESCOBAR-CALDERON; Barbora VODÁKOVÁ; Martin REICHARD; Xiubao CHEN; Monte MCGREGOR; Jian YANG a Manuel LOPES-LIMA

Vydání

Biological Conservation, Elsevier, 2021, 0006-3207

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10617 Marine biology, freshwater biology, limnology

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 7.499

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/21:00121504

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Freshwater mussels; In vitro; Glochidia; Metamorphosis; Conservation methods; Captive breeding

Štítky

14314020, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 30. 4. 2021 11:50, Mgr. Marie Novosadová Šípková, DiS.

Anotace

V originále

Captive breeding is an effective conservation strategy, but it has risks, especially when a life history stage of an organism is bypassed. Freshwater mussels (Unionida) are critically imperiled, and their larvae are parasites on fishes. Traditional mussel captive breeding involves artificially infesting fishes with larvae (in vivo), but increasingly used in vitro methods allow larval metamorphosis in culture media, bypassing the parasitic stage. We provide the first comparisons of mussel performance between in vitro and in vivo methods in the wild and throughout the mussel life cycle using two mussel species. In six streams, survival and growth did not differ between in vitroand in vivo-produced Lampsilis cardium. Metamorphosis of Sinanodonta woodiana differed sharply between two in vitro protocols (methods 1 and 2), but metamorphosis for method 2 was twice as high as in vivo. Survival and growth after eight days was lower for in vitro method 1 than method 2 and in vivo, showing that suboptimal in vitro protocols can have lingering effects on juvenile performance. However, survival and growth did not differ among methods by the end of the first and second growing seasons. Most importantly, in vitro-produced mussels survived, grew to maturity, and produced F2 juveniles naturally on fishes, all at rates that did not differ from in vivo-produced mussels. We detected no strong side effects of bypassing the mussel host-fish stage, but this study illustrates the importance of assessing consequences of captive breeding methods for any organism in a variety of environmental and life history contexts.

Citovat

DOUDA, Karel; Wendell R HAAG; Felipe ESCOBAR-CALDERON; Barbora VODÁKOVÁ; Martin REICHARD; Xiubao CHEN; Monte MCGREGOR; Jian YANG a Manuel LOPES-LIMA. Effects of in vitro metamorphosis on survival, growth, and reproductive success of freshwater mussels. Biological Conservation. Elsevier, 2021, roč. 254, February, s. "108964", 8 s. ISSN 0006-3207. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108964.

@article{1764639,
   author = {Douda, Karel and Haag, Wendell R and EscobarandCalderon, Felipe and Vodáková, Barbora and Reichard, Martin and Chen, Xiubao and McGregor, Monte and Yang, Jian and LopesandLima, Manuel},
   article_number = {February},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108964},
   keywords = {Freshwater mussels; In vitro; Glochidia; Metamorphosis; Conservation methods; Captive breeding},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0006-3207},
   journal = {Biological Conservation},
   title = {Effects of in vitro metamorphosis on survival, growth, and reproductive success of freshwater mussels},
   url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320721000161},
   volume = {254},
   year = {2021}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1764639
AU  - Douda, Karel - Haag, Wendell R - Escobar-Calderon, Felipe - Vodáková, Barbora - Reichard, Martin - Chen, Xiubao - McGregor, Monte - Yang, Jian - Lopes-Lima, Manuel
PY  - 2021
TI  - Effects of in vitro metamorphosis on survival, growth, and reproductive success of freshwater mussels
JF  - Biological Conservation
VL  - 254
IS  - February
SP  - "108964"
EP  - "108964"
PB  - Elsevier
SN  - 00063207
KW  - Freshwater mussels
KW  - In vitro
KW  - Glochidia
KW  - Metamorphosis
KW  - Conservation methods
KW  - Captive breeding
UR  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320721000161
N2  - Captive breeding is an effective conservation strategy, but it has risks, especially when a life history stage of an organism is bypassed. Freshwater mussels (Unionida) are critically imperiled, and their larvae are parasites on fishes. Traditional mussel captive breeding involves artificially infesting fishes with larvae (in vivo), but increasingly used in vitro methods allow larval metamorphosis in culture media, bypassing the parasitic stage. We provide the first comparisons of mussel performance between in vitro and in vivo methods in the wild and throughout the mussel life cycle using two mussel species. In six streams, survival and growth did not differ between in vitroand in vivo-produced Lampsilis cardium. Metamorphosis of Sinanodonta woodiana differed sharply between two in vitro protocols (methods 1 and 2), but metamorphosis for method 2 was twice as high as in vivo. Survival and growth after eight days was lower for in vitro method 1 than method 2 and in vivo, showing that suboptimal in vitro protocols can have lingering effects on juvenile performance. However, survival and growth did not differ among methods by the end of the first and second growing seasons. Most importantly, in vitro-produced mussels survived, grew to maturity, and produced F2 juveniles naturally on fishes, all at rates that did not differ from in vivo-produced mussels. We detected no strong side effects of bypassing the mussel host-fish stage, but this study illustrates the importance of assessing consequences of captive breeding methods for any organism in a variety of environmental and life history contexts.
ER  -

DOUDA, Karel; Wendell R HAAG; Felipe ESCOBAR-CALDERON; Barbora VODÁKOVÁ; Martin REICHARD; Xiubao CHEN; Monte MCGREGOR; Jian YANG a Manuel LOPES-LIMA. Effects of in vitro metamorphosis on survival, growth, and reproductive success of freshwater mussels. \textit{Biological Conservation}. Elsevier, 2021, roč.~254, February, s.~''108964'', 8 s. ISSN~0006-3207. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108964.

Přehled o publikaci