2010
Pellet Coating Thickness Determination by Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy: Comparison of Two Reference Methods
MUSELÍK, Jan; Kateřina DVOŘÁČKOVÁ; Kateřina KREJČOVÁ; Miloslava RABIŠKOVÁ; Jiří PAZOUREK et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Pellet Coating Thickness Determination by Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy: Comparison of Two Reference Methods
Autoři
MUSELÍK, Jan; Kateřina DVOŘÁČKOVÁ; Kateřina KREJČOVÁ; Miloslava RABIŠKOVÁ; Jiří PAZOUREK; Sylvia MARTON; Michaela DRAČKOVÁ a Lenka VORLOVÁ
Vydání
Current Pharmaceutical Analysis, Sharjah, Bentham Science Publishers, 2010, 1573-4129
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30104 Pharmacology and pharmacy
Stát vydavatele
Spojené arabské emiráty
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 1.710
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Organizační jednotka
Farmaceutická fakulta
UT WoS
Klíčová slova anglicky
Near-infrared spectroscopy; Pharmaceutical applications; Pellet coating; Coating thickness
Příznaky
Recenzováno
Změněno: 15. 5. 2021 19:02, doc. RNDr. Bc. Jiří Pazourek, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
The application of classical methods for pellet coating thickness determination (weight gain, microscopic analysis, dissolution testing) is time-consuming or does not consider pellets loss during the coating procedure. Therefore, these methods are not optimal for process control during pellets coating. The aim of this study was to develop rapid and valid methods for the determination of pellets average coating thickness by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). NIRS is not the primary method; therefore reference data are required for calibration. Data obtained from two reference methods for coating thickness determination (microscopic analysis, a geometric model calculated from pellets weight and density) were mutually compared. A geometric model was chosen as the simpler, quicker and more robust reference method. The polymer films studied were ethylcellulose (EC) and Eudragit (R) RS (ERS) applied on pellets in a Wurster column. The calibration models were carried out by partial least squares (PLS) regression, with two factors for EC and ERS films, respectively. The PLS validation sets had r > 0.97, and a standard error of validation, 3.29 mu m (range tested 10 - 70 mu m), for the EC film and 1.10 mu m (range tested 2 - 20 mu m) for the ERS film. The obtained results clearly demonstrate the feasibility of NIRS as a part of quality control procedure in the pharmaceutical industry.