The Use of Preliminary Reference Procedure by National
Constitutional Courts: Beyond Impressions

k 2021

The Use of Preliminary Reference Procedure by National Constitutional Courts: Beyond Impressions

PIVODA, Marek

Základní údaje

Originální název

The Use of Preliminary Reference Procedure by National Constitutional Courts: Beyond Impressions

Autoři

PIVODA, Marek

Vydání

The European Consortium for Political Research: ECPR General Conference 2021, 2021

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Obor

50501 Law

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

Změněno: 24. 5. 2024 09:23, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

The existing research relating to national connotational courts (CCs) and EU law focuses mainly on the theory of constitutional pluralism or the theory of judicial dialogue between the CJEU and CCs. Even though the two narratives stem from an intuition which is in itself hardly disputable, they do not elucidate what the interactions amount to in practice. The pitfall of the scholarly debate is that the research focuses either on the examination of the most prominent examples of CCs’ backlash against the CJEU or on the descriptive analysis of the individual approaches of CCs. No comprehensive attempt has been made in order to examine the real state of a judicial dialogue between CCs and the CJEU through preliminary reference procedure empirically. The proposed article aims to address these gaps in legal and political literature and elucidate the position of CCs within the EU judicial system. The central message of the article is rather minimalistic: We should now look beyond traditional narratives which uncritically glorify the idea of limitless judicial dialogue on the one hand, and which dramatically alert to catastrophic judicial backlash on the other hand. Let us search for comprehensive evidence of judicial behaviour instead. In other words, it is important to look beyond the statistics and the reasons why CCs ask the questions and attempt to assess whether CCs ask the right questions and thus fulfil their specific role within the EU judicial system.

Návaznosti

MUNI/IGA/1383/2020, interní kód MU

Název: Constitutional Courts and EU Integration through Law: Beyond Preliminary References

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Constitutional Courts and EU Integration through Law: Beyond Preliminary References

Citovat

PIVODA, Marek. The Use of Preliminary Reference Procedure by National Constitutional Courts: Beyond Impressions. In The European Consortium for Political Research: ECPR General Conference 2021. 2021.

@proceedings{1789657,
   author = {Pivoda, Marek},
   booktitle = {The European Consortium for Political Research: ECPR General Conference 2021},
   language = {eng},
   title = {The Use of Preliminary Reference Procedure by National Constitutional Courts: Beyond Impressions},
   year = {2021}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 1789657
AU  - Pivoda, Marek
PY  - 2021
TI  - The Use of Preliminary Reference Procedure by National Constitutional Courts: Beyond Impressions
N2  - The existing research relating to national connotational courts (CCs) and EU law focuses mainly on the theory of constitutional pluralism or the theory of judicial dialogue between the CJEU and CCs. Even though the two narratives stem from an intuition which is in itself hardly disputable, they do not elucidate what the interactions amount to in practice. The pitfall of the scholarly debate is that the research focuses either on the examination of the most prominent examples of CCs’ backlash against the CJEU or on the descriptive analysis of the individual approaches of CCs. No comprehensive attempt has been made in order to examine the real state of a judicial dialogue between CCs and the CJEU through preliminary reference procedure empirically. The proposed article aims to address these gaps in legal and political literature and elucidate the position of CCs within the EU judicial system. The central message of the article is rather minimalistic: We should now look beyond traditional narratives which uncritically glorify the idea of limitless judicial dialogue on the one hand, and which dramatically alert to catastrophic judicial backlash on the other hand. Let us search for comprehensive evidence of judicial behaviour instead. In other words, it is important to look beyond the statistics and the reasons why CCs ask the questions and attempt to assess whether CCs ask the right questions and thus fulfil their specific role within the EU judicial system.
ER  -

PIVODA, Marek. The Use of Preliminary Reference Procedure by National Constitutional Courts: Beyond Impressions. In \textit{The European Consortium for Political Research: ECPR General Conference 2021}. 2021.

Přehled o publikaci