Belting Before Belting From Moscow, to Constantinople, and to
Georgia

J 2021

Belting Before Belting From Moscow, to Constantinople, and to Georgia

FOLETTI, Ivan

Základní údaje

Originální název

Belting Before Belting From Moscow, to Constantinople, and to Georgia

Autoři

FOLETTI, Ivan

Vydání

Convivium: Exchanges and Interactions in the Arts of Medieval Europe, Byzantium, and the Mediterranean, 2021, 2336-3452

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

60401 Arts, Art history

Stát vydavatele

Belgie

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/21:00119189

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

UT WoS

000696183700002

Klíčová slova anglicky

Hans Belting; Byzantine art; Georgian art; historiography; Viktor Lazarev; nationalism; Ts’alenjikha; u.s.s.r.

Štítky

rivok

Změněno: 22. 4. 2022 11:24, prof. Mgr. Ondřej Jakubec, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

One of the last half century’s most important art historical theorists, Hans Belting has introduced revolutionary critical concepts and proposed new methodological solutions. Belting’s effect was beginning to be widely felt in 1979. While in Georgia studying the frescoes of the late-fourteenth-century Constantinopolitan painter Manuel Eugenikos at Ts’alenjikha, he clashed with Viktor Lazarev, one of the foremost experts on Byzantine art. Using a strictly stylistic method, Belting opposed Lazarev’s denigration of Manuel Eugenikos as representing Byzantine decadence. To Lazarev’s crypto-nationalist discourse, he argued against an internationalist outlook rooted in thought developed in the 1950s by scholars at Dumbarton Oaks in Washington, d.c. As this article articulates, both positions are best understood as part of the dialectic debate on the role of Byzantine art that, since the early-twentieth century, countered the Russian/Soviet historiography and the cosmopolitan one supported by émigré scholars in Europe and the United States.

Návaznosti

GF21-01706L, projekt VaV

Název: Kulturní dialogy v Jihokavkazském regionu ve středověku: historiografická a historicko-umělecká perspektiva (Akronym: CIMS)

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Cultural Interactions in the Medieval Subcaucasian Region: Historiographical and Art-Historical Perspectives, Partnerská agentura (Švýcarsko)

Citovat

FOLETTI, Ivan. Belting Before Belting From Moscow, to Constantinople, and to Georgia. Convivium: Exchanges and Interactions in the Arts of Medieval Europe, Byzantium, and the Mediterranean. 2021, roč. 8, Supplementum 1, s. 18-25. ISSN 2336-3452.

@article{1790274,
   author = {Foletti, Ivan},
   article_number = {Supplementum 1},
   keywords = {Hans Belting; Byzantine art; Georgian art; historiography; Viktor Lazarev; nationalism; Ts’alenjikha; u.s.s.r.},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {2336-3452},
   journal = {Convivium: Exchanges and Interactions in the Arts of Medieval Europe, Byzantium, and the Mediterranean},
   title = {Belting Before Belting From Moscow, to Constantinople, and to Georgia},
   url = {http://www.brepols.net/Pages/BrowseBySeries.aspx?TreeSeries=CONVISUP},
   volume = {8},
   year = {2021}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1790274
AU  - Foletti, Ivan
PY  - 2021
TI  - Belting Before Belting From Moscow, to Constantinople, and to Georgia
JF  - Convivium: Exchanges and Interactions in the Arts of Medieval Europe, Byzantium, and the Mediterranean
VL  - 8
IS  - Supplementum 1
SP  - 18-25
EP  - 18-25
SN  - 23363452
KW  - Hans Belting
KW  - Byzantine art
KW  - Georgian art
KW  - historiography
KW  - Viktor Lazarev
KW  - nationalism
KW  - Ts’alenjikha
KW  - u.s.s.r.
UR  - http://www.brepols.net/Pages/BrowseBySeries.aspx?TreeSeries=CONVISUP
N2  - One of the last half century’s most important art historical theorists, Hans Belting has introduced revolutionary critical concepts and proposed new methodological solutions. Belting’s effect was beginning to be widely felt in 1979. While in Georgia studying the frescoes of the late-fourteenth-century Constantinopolitan painter Manuel Eugenikos at Ts’alenjikha, he clashed with Viktor Lazarev, one of the foremost experts on Byzantine art. Using a strictly stylistic method, Belting opposed Lazarev’s denigration of Manuel Eugenikos as representing Byzantine decadence. To Lazarev’s crypto-nationalist discourse, he argued against an internationalist outlook rooted in thought developed in the 1950s by scholars at Dumbarton Oaks in Washington, d.c. As this article articulates, both positions are best understood as part of the dialectic debate on the role of Byzantine art that, since the early-twentieth century, countered the Russian/Soviet historiography and the cosmopolitan one supported by émigré scholars in Europe and the United States.
ER  -

FOLETTI, Ivan. Belting Before Belting From Moscow, to Constantinople, and to Georgia. \textit{Convivium: Exchanges and Interactions in the Arts of Medieval Europe, Byzantium, and the Mediterranean}. 2021, roč.~8, Supplementum 1, s.~18-25. ISSN~2336-3452.

Přehled o publikaci