2021
Prognostic value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I in heart failure patients with mid-range and reduced ejection fraction
LOKAJ, Petr; Jindřich ŠPINAR; Lenka ŠPINAROVÁ; Filip MALEK; Ondřej LUDKA et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Prognostic value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I in heart failure patients with mid-range and reduced ejection fraction
Autoři
LOKAJ, Petr; Jindřich ŠPINAR; Lenka ŠPINAROVÁ; Filip MALEK; Ondřej LUDKA; Jan KREJČÍ; Petr OSTADAL; Dagmar VONDRAKOVA; Karel LÁBR; Monika ŠPINAROVÁ; Monika PÁVKOVÁ GOLDBERGOVÁ; Marie MIKLÍKOVÁ; Kateřina HELÁNOVÁ; Ilona PARENICOVA; Vladimír JAKUBO; Klára BENEŠOVÁ; Roman MIKLIK; Jiří JARKOVSKÝ ORCID; Tomáš ONDRÚŠ a Jiří PAŘENICA
Vydání
Plos one, San Francisco, Public Library Science, 2021, 1932-6203
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
10700 1.7 Other natural sciences
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.752
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00122391
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I; heart failure patients; ejection fraction
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 21. 9. 2021 09:12, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Background The identification of high-risk heart failure (HF) patients makes it possible to intensify their treatment. Our aim was to determine the prognostic value of a newly developed, high-sensitivity troponin I assay (Atellica(R), Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; LVEF < 40%) and HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF) (LVEF 40%-49%). Methods and results A total of 520 patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF were enrolled in this study. Two-year all-cause mortality, heart transplantation, and/or left ventricular assist device implantation were defined as the primary endpoints (EP). A logistic regression analysis was used for the identification of predictors and development of multivariable models. The EP occurred in 14% of the patients, and these patients had higher NT-proBNP (1,950 vs. 518 ng/l; p < 0.001) and hs-cTnI (34 vs. 17 ng/l, p < 0.001) levels. C-statistics demonstrated that the optimal cut-off value for the hs-cTnI level was 17 ng/l (AUC 0.658, p < 0.001). Described by the AUC, the discriminatory power of the multivariable model (NYHA > II, NT-proBNP, hs-cTnI and urea) was 0.823 (p < 0.001). Including heart failure hospitalization as the component of the combined secondary endpoint leads to a diminished predictive power of increased hs-cTnI. Conclusion hs-cTnI levels >= 17 ng/l represent an independent increased risk of an adverse prognosis for patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF. Determining a patient's hs-cTnI level adds prognostic value to NT-proBNP and clinical parameters.