Detailed Information on Publication Record
2021
Peaceful Use of Lasers in Space : Context-Based Legitimacy in Global Governance of Large Technical Systems
BOHÁČEK, Petr, Pavel DUFEK and Nikola SCHMIDTBasic information
Original name
Peaceful Use of Lasers in Space : Context-Based Legitimacy in Global Governance of Large Technical Systems
Authors
BOHÁČEK, Petr, Pavel DUFEK and Nikola SCHMIDT
Edition
Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications, 2021, 0304-3754
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50601 Political science
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.000
Organization unit
Faculty of Social Studies
UT WoS
000691982800001
Keywords (in Czech)
globální vládnutí; velké technické systémy; demokratické dilema; bezpečnostní studia
Keywords in English
global governance; large technical systems; space policy; democratic dilemma; security studies
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 21/12/2021 08:34, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová
Abstract
V originále
Technology offers unique sets of opportunities, from human flourishing to civilization survival, but also challenges, from partial misuse to global apocalypse. Yet technology is shaped by the social environment in which it is developed and used, prompting questions about its desirable governance format. In this context, we look at governance challenges of large technical systems, specifically the peaceful use of high-power lasers in space, in order to propose a conceptual framework for legitimate global governance. Specifically, we adopt a context-based approach to legitimacy to address the trade-offs between effectiveness (output legitimacy) and inclusivity (input legitimacy) in the governance of large technical systems. We show that distinguishing two basic phases of space laser policy which call for different legitimacy criteria helps balance out the trade-offs without sacrificing either effectiveness or inclusivity. Finally, we construe LTSs’ governance as a tool for creating globally networked spaces which may enable coordinated global democratic governance.