Operationalization of group boundaries in research of religious
prosociality

k 2021

Operationalization of group boundaries in research of religious prosociality

KOPPOVÁ, Kateřina

Základní údaje

Originální název

Operationalization of group boundaries in research of religious prosociality

Autoři

KOPPOVÁ, Kateřina

Vydání

ISORECEA conference: Religion on the Periphery, online, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 15. – 17. 4. 2021, 2021

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Obor

60304 Religious studies

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

Klíčová slova česky

skupinové hranice; prosocialita; identita; etnické značky

Klíčová slova anglicky

group boundaries; prosociality; identity; ethnic markers

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 16. 2. 2022 10:50, Mgr. Ivona Vrzalová

Anotace

V originále

Into some social bonds, we are already born (kin), while into others, we decide for ourselves whether and to what extent we want to be part of them (kith). Similarly, an affiliation to a religious group can be obtained through early socialization by these primary bonds or later in life more based on oneself decision. Groups that we consider as "our own" are usually preferred over other groups. More prosocial acts, such as investing more resources (e. g., energy, time, money), emerge towards members of the same group. In current evolutionary grounded research on religious prosociality, the terms ingroup and outgroup are used to distinguish groups to which an individual belongs or does not. Belonging to different groups contributes to the formation of an individual's varied identity. Social groups can be seen as dynamic organisms that continually change - arise, regroup, and disappear. However, the question remains how it is possible to operationalize the group's belonging and where to lead the dividing line of group boundaries. In this paper, the focus will be not only on the theoretical context of these questions but also on concrete ways in which current research copes with the complexity of these phenomena.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/1444/2020, interní kód MU

Název: Evoluční a kognitivní výzkum náboženství (Akronym: EVAKON)

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Evoluční a kognitivní výzkum náboženství

MUNI/A/1483/2020, interní kód MU

Název: Nové výzkumné směry v historicky orientovaném výzkumu náboženství (Akronym: NOVÝSHOVÝN)

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Nové výzkumné směry v historicky orientovaném výzkumu náboženství

Citovat

KOPPOVÁ, Kateřina. Operationalization of group boundaries in research of religious prosociality. In ISORECEA conference: Religion on the Periphery, online, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 15. – 17. 4. 2021. 2021.

@proceedings{1793899,
   author = {Koppová, Kateřina},
   booktitle = {ISORECEA conference: Religion on the Periphery, online, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 15. – 17. 4. 2021},
   keywords = {group boundaries; prosociality; identity; ethnic markers},
   language = {eng},
   title = {Operationalization of group boundaries in research of religious prosociality},
   url = {https://isorecea2020.upol.cz/program/#program},
   year = {2021}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 1793899
AU  - Koppová, Kateřina
PY  - 2021
TI  - Operationalization of group boundaries in research of religious prosociality
KW  - group boundaries
KW  - prosociality
KW  - identity
KW  - ethnic markers
UR  - https://isorecea2020.upol.cz/program/#program
N2  - Into some social bonds, we are already born (kin), while into others, we decide for ourselves whether and to what extent we want to be part of them (kith). Similarly, an affiliation to a religious group can be obtained through early socialization by these primary bonds or later in life more based on oneself decision. Groups that we consider as "our own" are usually preferred over other groups. More prosocial acts, such as investing more resources (e. g., energy, time, money), emerge towards members of the same group. In current evolutionary grounded research on religious prosociality, the terms ingroup and outgroup are used to distinguish groups to which an individual belongs or does not. Belonging to different groups contributes to the formation of an individual's varied identity. Social groups can be seen as dynamic organisms that continually change - arise, regroup, and disappear. However, the question remains how it is possible to operationalize the group's belonging and where to lead the dividing line of group boundaries. In this paper, the focus will be not only on the theoretical context of these questions but also on concrete ways in which current research copes with the complexity of these phenomena.
ER  -

KOPPOVÁ, Kateřina. Operationalization of group boundaries in research of religious prosociality. In \textit{ISORECEA conference: Religion on the Periphery, online, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 15. – 17. 4. 2021}. 2021.

Přehled o publikaci