a 2021

Teaching Practice in Pre-Service Teacher Education: A Comparative Analysis in Four European Countries

JURIŠEVIČ, Mojča; Juan Luis Castejon COSTA; Borut KODRIČ; Raquel Gilar CORBI; Florian HOFMANN et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Teaching Practice in Pre-Service Teacher Education: A Comparative Analysis in Four European Countries

Autoři

JURIŠEVIČ, Mojča; Juan Luis Castejon COSTA; Borut KODRIČ; Raquel Gilar CORBI; Florian HOFMANN; Bohumíra LAZAROVÁ; Zlatan MAGAJNA; Maja MEŠKO; Neža PODLOGAR; Milan POL; Lisa POSSE; Anita TRNAVČEVIČ; Urška ŽERAK a Michaela GLASER-ZIKUDA

Vydání

GLOBE - Global conference on education, 2021

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Konferenční abstrakt

Obor

50301 Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ne

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

ISSN

Klíčová slova anglicky

teaching practice; pre-service teachers; mentor teachers; professional socialization of teachers
Změněno: 21. 4. 2022 12:33, doc. Mgr. Martin Sedláček, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

The presentation highlights the perceived quality of teaching practice (TP) of student teachers in Czech Republic, Germany, Slovenia and Spain, as part of the international project entitled INSHIP: Teaching Practice Partnership Model in Pre-Service Teacher Education. The project’s main aim is to develop an innovative model for teaching practice in initial teacher education across Europe, as initial teacher education in the European Higher Education Area is still quite fragmented and diverse in its length and content (Day et al., 2021; European Commission, 2013; Korthagen, 2010; Lawson et al., 2015; Simões et al., 2018). Therefore, the research focuses on national case studies with the aim of gaining a deeper understanding of TP in different educational contexts, capturing the characteristics of good practice and identifying its strengths and weaknesses as a basis for improved quality assurance. A qualitative research approach was used. Student teachers, their university and school mentors and the head teachers of mentor schools were interviewed about their experiences of TP and the content of TP documents was analyzed. The results of the cross-case analysis of the learning objectives of TP show a similar pattern, while the approaches to achieving these objectives differ. Similarities were also found in SWOT; the legal framework is both a barrier and facilitator for TP. More time, less bureaucracy, more motivation among student teachers, and more relevant teaching experiences/opportunities were found to be needed. Student teachers and academic staff identified three main areas in which TP is currently embedded: legal framework, technology and administration. The core of teaching practice - quality, personal development, motivation, communication, professional competencies, and professional identity development - is represented in these themes.