Comparative study for investigation of BOPP foil surface
treatment by different atmospheric-pressure plasma sources

a 2021

Comparative study for investigation of BOPP foil surface treatment by different atmospheric-pressure plasma sources

JAMAATI KENARI, Ali; Slavomír SIHELNÍK; Jakub KELAR a Dušan KOVÁČIK

Základní údaje

Originální název

Comparative study for investigation of BOPP foil surface treatment by different atmospheric-pressure plasma sources

Autoři

JAMAATI KENARI, Ali; Slavomír SIHELNÍK ; Jakub KELAR a Dušan KOVÁČIK

Vydání

2nd Plasma Nanotechnologies and Bioapplications Workshop, 2021

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Konferenční abstrakt

Obor

10305 Fluids and plasma physics

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

ISBN

978-80-210-9946-3

Klíčová slova anglicky

BOPP foil; DCSBD; plasma jet array; Multi-hollow surface dielectric barrier discharge

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam

Změněno: 5. 11. 2021 11:47, Mgr. Marie Novosadová Šípková, DiS.

Anotace

V originále

For polymer materials surface treatment, cold atmospheric plasma is widely used [1]. Polypropylene (PP) is a famous type of polyolefin used in a wide variety of applications. Although the biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP) films have many advantageous properties, their applications have limitations due to the poor adhesion properties resulting from their non-polar nature and low surface energy [2,3]. In this comparison study, the 25 m thin BOPP film was treated by plasma generated by three different atmospheric-pressure plasma sources, specifically by diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge (DCSBD) with the concavely curved electrode installed in the roll-to-roll reactor [4], plasma jet array (Fig. 1) [5], and multi-hollow surface dielectric barrier discharge (MSDBD) [6]. DCSBD was generated in ambient air by supplying the sinusoidal high voltage with the amplitude of 10 kV and the frequency of 15 kHz at the plasma power density of 2.5 W/cm2 corresponding power 400 W. The plasma jet array was operated in argon used as the working gas. The supplying voltage was of the sinusoidal waveform with 8 kV peak-to-peak value and of 23 kHz frequency at power 12 W. In the case of MSDBD used as a plasma source for the treatment, the voltage amplitude was 7 kV, and the frequency was 27 kHz at 30 W power. During the plasma treatment, the following distances between treated BOPP film and plasma sources were kept: 0.3 mm from the curved ceramics of DCSBD, 50 mm from the plasma jet nozzle, and 0.3 mm from the perforated ceramics of MSDBD. The samples were treated by plasma for the exposure times 1 s, 3 s, 5 s, 10 s. The surface wettability of BOPP film treated by all plasma sources was investigated by measuring the water contact angle (WCA) immediately after treatment, and for DCSBD and plasma jet treatment also after 1 and 3 weeks later to study the stability of the treatment and the possible ageing behavior. Furthermore, Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (ATR-FTIR) for characterization of the plasma-induced chemical groups changes on the surface, the profilometer/roughness gauge for roughness measurement, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for BOPP film surface morphology investigation were used and the results were compared. The best WCA values immediately after treatment were shown for the treatment by plasma jet with 10 s exposure time. However, the most stable treatment was confirmed for DCSBD plasma treatment with the 5 second exposure time. The results of SEM and roughness measurement of the BOPP film surface after DCSBD and plasma jet treatments were very similar.

Citovat

JAMAATI KENARI, Ali; Slavomír SIHELNÍK; Jakub KELAR a Dušan KOVÁČIK. Comparative study for investigation of BOPP foil surface treatment by different atmospheric-pressure plasma sources. In 2nd Plasma Nanotechnologies and Bioapplications Workshop. 2021. ISBN 978-80-210-9946-3.

@proceedings{1801308,
   author = {Jamaati Kenari, Ali and Sihelník, Slavomír and Kelar, Jakub and Kováčik, Dušan},
   booktitle = {2nd Plasma Nanotechnologies and Bioapplications Workshop},
   keywords = {BOPP foil; DCSBD; plasma jet array; Multi-hollow surface dielectric barrier discharge},
   language = {eng},
   isbn = {978-80-210-9946-3},
   title = {Comparative study for investigation of BOPP foil surface treatment by different atmospheric-pressure plasma sources},
   url = {https://munispace.muni.cz/library/catalog/book/2111},
   year = {2021}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 1801308
AU  - Jamaati Kenari, Ali - Sihelník, Slavomír - Kelar, Jakub - Kováčik, Dušan
PY  - 2021
TI  - Comparative study for investigation of BOPP foil surface treatment by different atmospheric-pressure plasma sources
SN  - 9788021099463
KW  - BOPP foil
KW  - DCSBD
KW  - plasma jet array
KW  - Multi-hollow surface dielectric barrier discharge
UR  - https://munispace.muni.cz/library/catalog/book/2111
N2  - For polymer materials surface treatment, cold atmospheric plasma is widely used [1]. Polypropylene (PP) is a famous type of polyolefin used in a wide variety of applications. Although the biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP) films have many advantageous properties, their applications have limitations due to the poor adhesion properties resulting from their non-polar nature and low surface energy [2,3]. In this comparison study, the 25 m thin BOPP film was treated by plasma generated by three different atmospheric-pressure plasma sources, specifically by diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge (DCSBD) with the concavely curved electrode installed in the roll-to-roll reactor [4], plasma jet array (Fig. 1) [5], and multi-hollow surface dielectric barrier discharge (MSDBD) [6]. DCSBD was generated in ambient air by supplying the sinusoidal high voltage with the amplitude of 10 kV and the frequency of 15 kHz at the plasma power density of 2.5 W/cm2 corresponding power 400 W. The plasma jet array was operated in argon used as the working gas. The supplying voltage was of the sinusoidal waveform with 8 kV peak-to-peak value and of 23 kHz frequency at power 12 W. In the case of MSDBD used as a plasma source for the treatment, the voltage amplitude was 7 kV, and the frequency was 27 kHz at 30 W power. During the plasma treatment, the following distances between treated BOPP film and plasma sources were kept: 0.3 mm from the curved ceramics of DCSBD, 50 mm from the plasma jet nozzle, and 0.3 mm from the perforated ceramics of MSDBD. The samples were treated by plasma for the exposure times 1 s, 3 s, 5 s, 10 s. The surface wettability of BOPP film treated by all plasma sources was investigated by measuring the water contact angle (WCA) immediately after treatment, and for DCSBD and plasma jet treatment also after 1 and 3 weeks later to study the stability of the treatment and the possible ageing behavior. Furthermore, Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (ATR-FTIR) for characterization of the plasma-induced chemical groups changes on the surface, the profilometer/roughness gauge for roughness measurement, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for BOPP film surface morphology investigation were used and the results were compared. The best WCA values immediately after treatment were shown for the treatment by plasma jet with 10 s exposure time. However, the most stable treatment was confirmed for DCSBD plasma treatment with the 5 second exposure time. The results of SEM and roughness measurement of the BOPP film surface after DCSBD and plasma jet treatments were very similar.
ER  -

JAMAATI KENARI, Ali; Slavomír SIHELNÍK; Jakub KELAR a Dušan KOVÁČIK. Comparative study for investigation of BOPP foil surface treatment by different atmospheric-pressure plasma sources. In \textit{2nd Plasma Nanotechnologies and Bioapplications Workshop}. 2021. ISBN~978-80-210-9946-3.

Přehled o publikaci