2021
The annual recurrence risk model for tailored surveillance strategy in patients with cervical cancer
CIBULA, David; Luaks DOSTALEK; Jiří JARKOVSKÝ; C. H. MOM; A. LOPEZ et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
The annual recurrence risk model for tailored surveillance strategy in patients with cervical cancer
Autoři
CIBULA, David; Luaks DOSTALEK; Jiří JARKOVSKÝ ORCID; C. H. MOM; A. LOPEZ; H. FALCONER; A. FAGOTTI; A. AYHAN; S. H. KIM; D. I. ORTIZ; J. KLAT; A. OBERMAIR; F. LANDONI; J. RODRIGUEZ; R. MANCHANDA; J. KOSTUN; R. DOS REIS; M. M. MEYDANLI; D. ODETTO; R. LAKY; I. ZAPARDIEL; Vít WEINBERGER; Klára BENEŠOVÁ; Martina BORCINOVA; D. PARI; S. SALEHI; N. BIZZARRI; H. AKILLI; N. R. ABU-RUSTUM; R. A. SALCEDO-HERNANDEZ; Veronika JAVURKOVA; Jiri SLAMA a L. R. C. W. VAN LONKHUIJZEN
Vydání
European Journal of Cancer, Oxford, Elsevier Science Inc. 2021, 0959-8049
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30204 Oncology
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 10.002
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00122899
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Cervical cancer; Surveillance; Prognostic model; Annual recurrence risk
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 22. 11. 2021 13:17, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Purpose: Current guidelines for surveillance strategy in cervical cancer are rigid, recommending the same strategy for all survivors. The aim of this study was to develop a robust model allowing for individualised surveillance based on a patient's risk profile. Methods: Data of 4343 early-stage patients with cervical cancer treated between 2007 and 2016 were obtained from the international SCCAN (Surveillance in Cervical Cancer) consortium. The Cox proportional hazards model predicting disease-free survival (DFS) was developed and internally validated. The risk score, derived from regression coefficients of the model, stratified the cohort into significantly distinctive risk groups. On its basis, the annual recurrence risk model (ARRM) was calculated. Results: Five variables were included in the prognostic model: maximal pathologic tumour diameter; tumour histotype; grade; number of positive pelvic lymph nodes; and lymphovascular space invasion. Five risk groups significantly differing in prognosis were identified with a five-year DFS of 97.5%, 94.7%, 85.2% and 63.3% in increasing risk groups, whereas a two-year DFS in the highest risk group equalled 15.4%. Based on the ARRM, the annual recurrence risk in the lowest risk group was below 1% since the beginning of follow-up and declined below 1% at years three, four and >5 in the medium-risk groups. In the whole cohort, 26% of recurrences appeared at the first year of the follow-up, 48% by year two and 78% by year five. Conclusion: The ARRM represents a potent tool for tailoring the surveillance strategy in early-stage patients with cervical cancer based on the patient's risk status and respective annual recurrence risk. It can easily be used in routine clinical settings internationally. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.