The Interpretation and Application of Fundamental Rights in
Civil Cases in the Czech Republic

J 2021

The Interpretation and Application of Fundamental Rights in Civil Cases in the Czech Republic

SEHNÁLEK, David

Základní údaje

Originální název

The Interpretation and Application of Fundamental Rights in Civil Cases in the Czech Republic

Autoři

SEHNÁLEK, David (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

Jogelméleti Szemle [Journal of Legal Theory], 2021, 1588-080X

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Maďarsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Open access časopisu

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/21:00123084

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Interpretation; Reasoning; Argumentation; Fundamental rights; Constitutional court

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 4. 3. 2022 13:38, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

The aim of this article is to determine and shed light on the specific features of application and interpretation of fundamental rights in the field of civil law in the Czech Republic. The article follows a methodology developed by Prof. Z. Tóth to examine decisions made by constitutional courts in Central Europe and works with an analysis of 10 selected rulings of the Czech Constitutional Court (CCC). The article scrutinises these decisions one by one, according to the areas to which they materially belong. A quantitative analysis of the individual interpretation methods follows in the conclusion. The reason why I opted for this approach is that decisions in individual cases are relatively strongly influenced by two factors in terms of the methodology and values. The first is the specific panel of justices that is called on to hear a certain case and the second is the justice-rapporteur appointed to present it to this panel. What is important from the perspective of this article is not the actual solution to each given matter, but rather the process by which the CCC arrived at the solution. The article therefore focuses primarily on the methods of interpretation and the arguments used in each case, and on significance the CCC attributed to these methods and arguments in the reasoning of its decisions.

Citovat

SEHNÁLEK, David. The Interpretation and Application of Fundamental Rights in Civil Cases in the Czech Republic. Jogelméleti Szemle [Journal of Legal Theory]. 2021, roč. 2021, č. 4, s. 142-151. ISSN 1588-080X.

@article{1806737,
   author = {Sehnálek, David},
   article_number = {4},
   keywords = {Interpretation; Reasoning; Argumentation; Fundamental rights; Constitutional court},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1588-080X},
   journal = {Jogelméleti Szemle [Journal of Legal Theory]},
   title = {The Interpretation and Application of Fundamental Rights in Civil Cases in the Czech Republic},
   url = {https://jesz.ajk.elte.hu/2021_4.pdf},
   volume = {2021},
   year = {2021}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1806737
AU  - Sehnálek, David
PY  - 2021
TI  - The Interpretation and Application of Fundamental Rights in Civil Cases in the Czech Republic
JF  - Jogelméleti Szemle [Journal of Legal Theory]
VL  - 2021
IS  - 4
SP  - 142-151
EP  - 142-151
SN  - 1588080X
KW  - Interpretation
KW  - Reasoning
KW  - Argumentation
KW  - Fundamental rights
KW  - Constitutional court
UR  - https://jesz.ajk.elte.hu/2021_4.pdf
N2  - The aim of this article is to determine and shed light on the specific features of application and interpretation of fundamental rights in the field of civil law in the Czech Republic. The article follows a methodology developed by Prof. Z. Tóth to examine decisions made by constitutional courts in Central Europe and works with an analysis of 10 selected rulings of the Czech Constitutional Court (CCC). The article scrutinises these decisions one by one, according to the areas to which they materially belong. A quantitative analysis of the individual interpretation methods follows in the conclusion. The reason why I opted for this approach is that decisions in individual cases are relatively strongly influenced by two factors in terms of the methodology and values. The first is the specific panel of justices that is called on to hear a certain case and the second is the justice-rapporteur appointed to present it to this panel. What is important from the perspective of this article is not the actual solution to each given matter, but rather the process by which the CCC arrived at the solution. The article therefore focuses primarily on the methods of interpretation and the arguments used in each case, and on significance the CCC attributed to these methods and arguments in the reasoning of its decisions.
ER  -

SEHNÁLEK, David. The Interpretation and Application of Fundamental Rights in Civil Cases in the Czech Republic. \textit{Jogelméleti Szemle [Journal of Legal Theory]}. 2021, roč.~2021, č.~4, s.~142-151. ISSN~1588-080X.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci