Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@inproceedings{1817450,
author = {Provazník, Patrik},
address = {Brno},
booktitle = {Cofola International 2021},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8639-2021-13},
edition = {1},
editor = {Malachta Radovan a Patrik Provazník (eds.)},
keywords = {Court of Arbitration for Sport; Lex Sportiva; Standard of Proof; Comfortable Satisfaction; Variable Approach; Constant Approach; Consistency},
howpublished = {elektronická verze "online"},
language = {eng},
location = {Brno},
isbn = {978-80-210-8638-8},
pages = {345-370},
publisher = {Masaryk University},
title = {Comfortable Satisfaction Before the Court of Arbitration for Sport: Consistency Despite Differences?},
url = {https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/cofola-international/cofola-international-2021.pdf},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1817450
AU - Provazník, Patrik
PY - 2021
TI - Comfortable Satisfaction Before the Court of Arbitration for Sport: Consistency Despite Differences?
PB - Masaryk University
CY - Brno
SN - 9788021086388
KW - Court of Arbitration for Sport
KW - Lex Sportiva
KW - Standard of Proof
KW - Comfortable Satisfaction
KW - Variable Approach
KW - Constant Approach
KW - Consistency
UR - https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/cofola-international/cofola-international-2021.pdf
N2 - The Court of Arbitration for Sport’s privileged position lends considerable authority to its adjudication practice, which gives rise to a number of principles that are subsequently adopted into general application. One of these principles is the standard of proof referred to as “comfortable satisfaction”. However, its application raises several theoretical and practical issues. An analysis of publicly available awards shows that there are different approaches to this standard across arbitral panels, which, in the eyes of theory, considerably affect the process of evidence. This contribution therefore seeks to present these different approaches against the backdrop of an analysis of available awards and academic debates, and to answer the question of whether these differences, translated into practice, cause inconsistencies within decision-making practice.
ER -
PROVAZNÍK, Patrik. Comfortable Satisfaction Before the Court of Arbitration for Sport: Consistency Despite Differences?. Online. In Malachta Radovan a Patrik Provazník (eds.). \textit{Cofola International 2021}. 1. vyd. Brno: Masaryk University, 2021, s.~345-370. ISBN~978-80-210-8638-8. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8639-2021-13.
|
