2020
Pediatric Life Support 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations
MACONOCHIE, IK, R AICKIN, MF HAZINSKI, DL ATKINS, R BINGHAM et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Pediatric Life Support 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations
Autoři
MACONOCHIE, IK, R AICKIN, MF HAZINSKI, DL ATKINS, R BINGHAM, TB COUTO, AM GUERGUERIAN, VM NADKARNI, KC NG, GA NUTHALL, GYK ONG, AG REIS, SM SCHEXNAYDER, BR SCHOLEFIELD, JA TIJSSEN, JP NOLAN, PT MORLEY, de Voorde P VAN, AL ZARITSKY a Jana DJAKOW
Vydání
Circulation, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams Wilkins, 2020, 0009-7322
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 29.690
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000589619800005
Klíčová slova anglicky
AHA Scientific Statements; arrhythmia; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; child; congenital heart disease; ECMO; pediatrics
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 31. 3. 2022 08:26, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) for pediatric life support is based on the most extensive evidence evaluation ever performed by the Pediatric Life Support Task Force. Three types of evidence evaluation were used in this review: systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence updates. Per agreement with the evidence evaluation recommendations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, only systematic reviews could result in a new or revised treatment recommendation. Systematic reviews performed for this 2020 CoSTR for pediatric life support included the topics of sequencing of airway-breaths-compressions versus compressions-airway-breaths in the delivery of pediatric basic life support, the initial timing and dose intervals for epinephrine administration during resuscitation, and the targets for oxygen and carbon dioxide levels in pediatric patients after return of spontaneous circulation. The most controversial topics included the initial timing and dose intervals of epinephrine administration (new treatment recommendations were made) and the administration of fluid for infants and children with septic shock (this latter topic was evaluated by evidence update). All evidence reviews identified the paucity of pediatric data and the need for more research involving resuscitation of infants and children.