ŠPETÍK, Ondřej. Impact of various methods for choosing a railway undertaking: Case evidence from the Czech Republic. Case Studies on Transport Policy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2022, roč. 10, č. 1, s. 616-624. ISSN 2213-624X. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.01.022.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Impact of various methods for choosing a railway undertaking: Case evidence from the Czech Republic
Autoři ŠPETÍK, Ondřej (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí).
Vydání Case Studies on Transport Policy, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2022, 2213-624X.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 50202 Applied Economics, Econometrics
Stát vydavatele Nizozemské království
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW URL
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 2.500
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14560/22:00125399
Organizační jednotka Ekonomicko-správní fakulta
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.01.022
UT WoS 000777213000012
Klíčová slova anglicky Transportation policy Competitive tendering Liberalisation of passenger rail transport
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Pavlína Kurková, učo 368752. Změněno: 21. 3. 2023 09:42.
Anotace
The liberalisation of passenger rail transport in the EU has brought a procedure (competitive tendering) for choosing a railway undertaking and observing the principles of transparency and non-discrimination. However, the latest experience has shown that this procedure has brought about many problems. Competitive tendering will be the obligatory method for choosing a railway undertaking under the EU regulation from 2023 (with some exceptions). This paper evaluates three methods (direct award, competitive tendering procedure, and direct award with competition) used for choosing a railway undertaking in different circumstances and assesses the EU regulation that specifies a rule for choosing the railway undertaking. Methodologically, the paper is based on four case studies of choosing railway undertaking in the Czech Republic and eight expert interviews with the representatives of railway undertakings and the representatives of public authorities. The results show that competitive tendering is suitable only for long-term simpler services where all necessary requirements are set in the tender documentation, no major changes can be expected during the contract period, and access to rolling stock is non-discriminatory. Direct award with competition is the best method of choosing a railway undertaking for more complex service delivery contracts because it enables PTAs to compare alternative bids, and thanks to cost-plus contracts it enables to respond flexibly to changes in the transport demand during the contract period with the control of costs and price due to the maximum amount of profit. Direct award is the best solution only if public authorities do not expect more bidders.
Návaznosti
EF16_026/0008430, projekt VaVNázev: Nová mobilita - vysokorychlostní dopravní systémy a dopravní chování populace
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 23. 5. 2024 17:33