2022
The First Episode in the Romanian Rule of Law Saga: Joined Cases C-83/19, C-127/19, C-195/19, C-291/19, C-355/19 and C-397/19, Asociaţia ‘Forumul Judecătorilor din România, and their follow-up at the national level
MORARU, Madalina Bianca a Raluca BERCEAZákladní údaje
Originální název
The First Episode in the Romanian Rule of Law Saga: Joined Cases C-83/19, C-127/19, C-195/19, C-291/19, C-355/19 and C-397/19, Asociaţia ‘Forumul Judecătorilor din România, and their follow-up at the national level
Autoři
MORARU, Madalina Bianca a Raluca BERCEA
Vydání
European Constitutional Law Review, 2022, 1574-0196
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50501 Law
Stát vydavatele
Nizozemské království
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.100
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14220/22:00125844
Organizační jednotka
Právnická fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Romanian Rule; Cases C-83/19; C-127/19; C-195/19; C-291/19; C-355/19 and C-397/19
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 28. 2. 2023 08:49, Mgr. Petra Georgala
Anotace
V originále
In the Asociaţia ‘Forumul Judecătorilor din România’ joined cases,Footnote 1 referred to throughout this case note as AFJR, the Court of Justice of the EU was asked to assess whether the reformed disciplinary, civil and criminal liability of magistrates introduced in Romania during 2017-2019 may affect the Romanian judiciary’s capacity to adjudicate independently, and comply with the EU rule of law values. This judgment is of fundamental importance to the legal order of the EU as it analyses for the first time the legal nature and effects of key EU instruments used to ensure the accession of new member states to the EU and rule of law monitoring: the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism Decision (hereafter CVM Decision)Footnote2 and the European Commission Reports monitoring Romania’s progress on the rule of law under this Mechanism. The case brings an important contribution to the Court of Justice rule of law approach by, first, introducing the principle of progression towards achieving EU rule of law standards as set out in the CVM Decision and Commission Reports. Second, the Court of Justice sets out similar judicial independence parameters for all types of judicial liability regimes, beyond the disciplinary one which has repeatedly appeared in the Polish case law. The judgment will also be remembered as a strong restatement of the legally binding principle of primacy of EU law for constitutional courts.
Návaznosti
| MUNI/J/0815/2021, interní kód MU |
|