Judicial Leadership and Judicial Governance: The Meta-roles of Court Presidents

HAMŘÍK, Lukáš a Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ. Judicial Leadership and Judicial Governance: The Meta-roles of Court Presidents. In ICON-S Annual Conference. 2022.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Judicial Leadership and Judicial Governance: The Meta-roles of Court Presidents

Autoři

HAMŘÍK, Lukáš ORCID a Katarína ŠIPULOVÁ ORCID

Vydání

ICON-S Annual Conference, 2022

---

Další údaje

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ne

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam

---

Anotace

V originále

The increasing power of court presidents, particularly in states with less institutionalized judiciaries, has been documented all over the world. We know that judges hold significant competences in judicial selections, careers, and disciplining of judges. They dominate court administration, oftentimes being equipped with strong informal powers that can impact the results of judicial decision-making. But court presidents execute many other roles. Compared to rank and file judges, they are no ivory towers. They participate on the legislative process, negotiate with executive bodies, they are publicly active, comment on political development, publish in media or hold academic positions. This article steps into the field with a new typology of court presidents‘ roles in the separation of powers. Using comparative examples, it discusses how entrenchment of informal powers distorts position of court presidents in separation of powers and shifts the understanding of judicial independence.

---

Návaznosti

101002660, interní kód MU

Název: Informal Judicial Institutions: Invisible Determinants of Democratic Decay (Akronym: INFINITY) Investor: Evropská unie, Informal Judicial Institutions: Invisible Determinants of Democratic Decay, ERC (Excellent Science)